An outside of the united states (ous) customer reports observation of a falsely depressed calcium result on an atellica ch 930 analyzer (b)(6), when using reagent lot 221818.The initial result was reported to the physician(s) who questioned the result.The sample was repeated on new reagent pack and higher result was obtained.The customer obtained a discrepant patient result with the atellica ch calcium method using an atellica ch 930 (b)(6).The original sample was repeated using the original instrument.The repeat result was used to issue a corrected report.Repeat of the same sample yielded the expected results.The return of the patient sample was not required or warranted based upon the results of the technical evaluation.Siemens reviewed the calibration data for cm00670 and observed that ca lot 221818 was placed into use on 06/29/2023.The customer had processed multiple packs/wells of reagent lot 221818 without issue until 08/16/2023 when the customer observed low recovery for the ca patient results using pack 14011/well 2.The customer loaded pack 14011 on 08/14/2023.Quality control (qc) was processed using this ca reagent pack/well was processed at 10:51 on 08/14/2023 when the pack was placed into use.The ca quality control (qc) recovery was acceptable and within a 2sd peer range (customer range not provided).The customer continued to use pack 14011/well 1 until 08/16/2023 at 15:23, when the instrument switched to well 2 of the same reagent pack on 08/16/2023 at 15:23.The patient sample was processed using pack 14011/well 2 prior to quality control (qc) being processed on 08/16/2023 at 17:35.Both level 1 (89711) and level 2 (89712) showed significantly low recovery and were outside of a 2sd peer range.The customer removed pack 14011 and no additional patient samples or quality control (qc) were processed using pack 14011/well 2.On 08/16/2023 at 18:32, the customer loaded a new reagent pack (14045), and calibrated ca.Quality control (qc) was processed after the calibration for the new pack 14045/well 1 and all results were within a 2sd peer range.The data showed the customer continued to process samples on 08/16/2023 using the new pack 1405/well 1 with no additional ca issues.The customer contained to use multiple a new ca reagent lot 231883.The customer inspected reagent pack 14011 after it was removed from the instrument and observed that well 2 appeared to be tinted yellow.When pack 14011/well 2 was compared to other ca reagent packs, the reagent was clear and not yellow.The customer provided a picture of the discolored reagent well.No other ca reagent packs for lot 221818 were impacted.The issue was isolated to a single well (well 2) of ca reagent pack 14011.Based on the information provided, siemens concludes the probable cause of the low discrepant ca patient results and out of range quality control (qc) was due to an issue with a single ca reagent well from one reagent pack of ca lot 221818.However, there is insufficient information available to identify what caused the single well of one ca reagent pack lot 221818 to be compromised/contaminated.No other packs/wells from ca lot 221818 were impacted.The issue was isolated to well 2 of a single ca reagent pack.The customer resolved the issue by replacing the affected ca reagent pack, calibrating, and processing quality control (qc).The customer continued to process samples using multiple packs/well of ca reagent lot 221818 with no further ca issues.The actions taken by the customer are part of normal troubleshooting for issues of this nature.The interpretation of results section of the atellica ch calcium instructions for use states: "results of this assay should always be interpreted in conjunction with the patient's medical history, clinical presentation, and other findings." the customer is currently fully operational.
|