EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES DR TRUWAVE DISPOSABLE PRESSURE TRANSDUCER; TRANSDUCER, PRESSURE, CATHETER TIP
|
Back to Search Results |
|
Model Number PX260 |
Device Problems
Material Separation (1562); Detachment of Device or Device Component (2907)
|
Patient Problem
Hemorrhage/Bleeding (1888)
|
Event Type
malfunction
|
Event Description
|
As reported, during use in patient with this disposable pressure transducer (dpt), the patient side tubing detached from dpt housing leaving an arterial line that was open to air.Patient bled back through the open arterial line.Fault was discovered before serious harm occurred, so there was no allegation of patient injury.Patient demographics unable to be obtained.No further information was available.The device was available for evaluation.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The product is expected to be returned for analysis; however, it has not yet been received.Upon the return of the product a supplemental report will be sent with the investigation results.Complaint histories for all reported events are reviewed against trending control limits on a monthly basis, and any excursions above the control limits are assessed and documented as part of this monthly review.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Added information to section d4 (expiration date) and h4 (device manufacturer date) and h6 (investigation findings) updated section h6 (component code), h6 (device code), h6 (type of investigation) and h6 (investigations conclusions).One disposable pressure transducer was received by our product evaluation laboratory for a full examination.The report of "tubing detached" was confirmed.As received, pressure tubing was found completely detached from bond joint with male connector.Indications of what appeared to be bonding material were evident on tubing bond surface area.Tubing od was measured to be 0.1390" near the point of detachment, was within specification.No other visible damage or inconsistency was found to the returned pressure line.The manufacturing records were reviewed for the lot involved and there is no indication of a related nonconformance.All process parameters were met and inspections passed successfully.Based on further engineering evaluation it can be concluded that the most probable cause of the defect can be associated to the solvent bonding process during the device manufacturing.Additionally, a pra was generated earlier.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|