It was reported to boston scientific corporation that an ultratome xl was used in the common bile duct (cbd) during an endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ercp) procedure performed on (b)(6), 2023.During the procedure, cannulation was performed.The physician bowed the device to cut.While he was trying to cut, the cutting wire of the ultratome xl broke.It was reported that no part of the cutting wire detached and fell into the patient.The physician removed the device, and the procedure was completed with another of the same device.There were no patient complications reported as a result of this event.
|
It was reported to boston scientific corporation that an ultratome xl was used in the common bile duct (cbd) during an endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ercp) procedure performed on (b)(6) 2023.During the procedure, cannulation was performed.The physician bowed the device to cut.While he was trying to cut, the cutting wire of the ultratome xl broke.It was reported that no part of the cutting wire detached and fell into the patient.The physician removed the device, and the procedure was completed with another of the same device.There were no patient complications reported as a result of this event.
|
Block h6: imdrf device code a0401 captures the reportable event of cutting wire broken.Block h10: the returned ultratome xl was analyzed, and a visual evaluation noted that the cutting wire was broken from the proximal pierce hole and was fully detached from the catheter, which are consistent with the findings when the device was observed under magnification.Additionally, the working length was torn from the distal tip section, the tip was smashed, and the anchor was dislodged.The returned guidewire was in good shape.No other problems with the device were noted.The reported event of cutting wire break was confirmed.Upon analysis, it was found that the cutting wire was broken from the proximal pierce hole, and it was fully detached.Based on the condition of the device, it could have been generated if there was contact between the device and the scope during energization or if the device exceeded the maximum of voltage during procedure as per precautions of the device states, also energizing the device prior to performing sphincterotomy can compromise the cutting wire's integrity, also it can cause a premature cutting wire fatigue, leading to break it.Once the cutting wire breaks, any attempt to remove the device from the scope can lead to detachment.It was also found that both pierce holes and the tip of the catheter were torn (working length torn), and the wire anchor was dislodged.These conditions could have been caused by submitting the catheter to tension forces during the handle actuation, also bowing the device without being completely out of the scope which can lead to tear it and displacing the cutting wire anchor from its position.The tip was smashed, which could have been caused by operational factors, such as manipulating the device through difficult anatomy, the technique used for the device manipulation or by the interaction between the device and the scope (hitting against a hard surface).It is most likely caused by procedural or anatomical factors encountered during the use of the device could have affected the device performance and its integrity.Based on all gathered information, the most probable root cause of this complaint is adverse event related to procedure.A labeling review was performed and, from the information available, this device was used per the instructions for use (ifu) / product label.
|