• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BIOMET UK LTD. OXFORD UNI TWIN-PEG FEMORAL XS; PROSTHESIS, KNEE, FEMOROTIBIAL, UNICOMPARTMENTAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BIOMET UK LTD. OXFORD UNI TWIN-PEG FEMORAL XS; PROSTHESIS, KNEE, FEMOROTIBIAL, UNICOMPARTMENTAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED Back to Search Results
Model Number N/A
Device Problems Fracture (1260); Malposition of Device (2616)
Patient Problems Failure of Implant (1924); Pain (1994); Loss of Range of Motion (2032)
Event Date 08/24/2023
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).D10 ¿ oxf anat brg rt x-sm 3mm pma, item#: 160790, lot#: 3889046; oxf uni tib tray sz c rm pma, item#: 154723, lot#: 6181776.G2 ¿ foreign ¿ china.The device will not be returned for analysis; however, an investigation of the reported event is in progress.Once the investigation is completed, a supplemental medwatch 3500a will be submitted.
 
Event Description
It was reported that the patient underwent revision surgery approximately five years and four months after replacement of the right knee due to fracture of the femoral component prosthesis, pain and limited mobility.Attempts have been made and no further information has been provided.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
This follow-up report is being submitted to relay additional information.Visual examination of the provided picture confirms a broken cemented femoral component.A review of the device manufacturing records confirmed no abnormalities or deviations that could be related to the reported event.Device is used for treatment.Radiographs were provided and reviewed by a radiologist who reported that initial radiographs demonstrated relative posterior placement of the femoral implant of the unicompartmental knee arthroplasty with subsequent femoral implant fracture.The initial femoral implant malposition could conceivably contribute to the likelihood of an implant fracture due to abnormal stress upon the implant.With the available information, a definitive root cause cannot be determined however femoral implant malposition could conceivably contribute to the likelihood of an implant fracture due to abnormal stress upon the implant.If any further information is found which would change or alter any conclusions or information, a supplemental report will be filed accordingly.Zimmer biomet will continue to monitor for trends.
 
Event Description
No further event information available at the time of this report.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
OXFORD UNI TWIN-PEG FEMORAL XS
Type of Device
PROSTHESIS, KNEE, FEMOROTIBIAL, UNICOMPARTMENTAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED
Manufacturer (Section D)
BIOMET UK LTD.
waterton industrial estates
bridgend CF31 3XA
UK  CF31 3XA
Manufacturer (Section G)
BIOMET UK LTD.
waterton industrial estates
bridgend CF31 3XA
UK   CF31 3XA
Manufacturer Contact
christina arnt
56 e. bell dr.
warsaw, IN 46582
5745273773
MDR Report Key17787369
MDR Text Key323894486
Report Number3002806535-2023-00310
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NRA
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeCH
PMA/PMN Number
P010014
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 10/10/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received09/21/2023
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Lay User/Patient
Device Model NumberN/A
Device Catalogue Number166940
Device Lot Number3978954
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Date Manufacturer Received10/10/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured02/20/2017
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Removal/Correction NumberN/A
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Hospitalization; Required Intervention;
Patient SexMale
Patient Weight84 KG
-
-