• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BOSTON SCIENTIFIC NEUROMODULATION SUPERION INDIRECT DECOMPRESSION SYSTEM; PROSTHESIS, SPINOUS PROCESS SPACER/PLATE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BOSTON SCIENTIFIC NEUROMODULATION SUPERION INDIRECT DECOMPRESSION SYSTEM; PROSTHESIS, SPINOUS PROCESS SPACER/PLATE Back to Search Results
Model Number 101-9812
Device Problems Difficult to Open or Close (2921); Material Integrity Problem (2978)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 09/11/2023
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
It was reported that during a superion indirect decompression system (ids) implant procedure, during deployment the physician could not get the spacer to open fully and the implant came apart.The physician had to reposition the implant two more times to get the implant to line up properly, and on the third attempt was when the implant broke.It was noted that the physician did not use excessive force while deploying the spacer, and the implant was properly attached to the inserter prior to deployment.Another spacer was implanted without incident and the patient was doing well postoperatively.The spacer will not be returned as it was lost.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Model 101-9812, lot 40027337: device analysis performed on the returned indirect decompression spacer revealed that the reported complaint of the spindle cap breaking was confirmed.Visual revealed that the spindle cap was completely sheared off from the implant body and spindle found to be outside of the main body.The damage to the implant was sufficient to prevent functional testing.In addition, visual examination of the returned implant also revealed that a cam-lobe was significantly bent.This damage suggests that the user exerted excessive force while attempting to deploy the implant against a rigid obstruction (spinous process).
 
Event Description
It was reported that during a superion indirect decompression system (ids) implant procedure, during deployment the physician could not get the spacer to open fully and the implant came apart.The physician had to reposition the implant two more times to get the implant to line up properly, and on the third attempt was when the implant broke.It was noted that the physician did not use excessive force while deploying the spacer, and the implant was properly attached to the inserter prior to deployment.Another spacer was implanted without incident and the patient was doing well postoperatively.The spacer will not be returned as it was lost.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
SUPERION INDIRECT DECOMPRESSION SYSTEM
Type of Device
PROSTHESIS, SPINOUS PROCESS SPACER/PLATE
Manufacturer (Section D)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC NEUROMODULATION
25155 rye canyon loop
valencia CA 91355
Manufacturer (Section G)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
cashel road
clonmel
EI  
Manufacturer Contact
erik sherburne
25155 rye canyon loop
valencia, CA 91355
7632920920
MDR Report Key17804192
MDR Text Key324127079
Report Number3006630150-2023-05790
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NQO
UDI-Device Identifier00884662000543
UDI-Public00884662000543
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P140004
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 12/12/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received09/22/2023
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model Number101-9812
Device Catalogue Number101-9812
Device Lot Number40027337
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received11/17/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured01/30/2023
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age69 YR
-
-