Coloplast has not been provided any corroborating evidence to verify the information contained in this report.Without the benefit of examination and testing, coloplast is precluded from commenting on the condition of the device or the cause of the occurrence.Should additional facts prompt us to alter or supplement any information or conclusions contained in the original mdr or in any prior supplemental reports, a follow-up report will be submitted.
|
As reported to coloplast, though not verified, legal representative stated the patient with this device experienced intense lower back/lower front abdominal pain about three months postop, slow urinary flow, recurrent urinary tract infections, hematuria, urinary hesitancy, back pain, foul odor, muscle spasms, pelvic pain, voiding dysfunction, urinary leakage, tenderness to palpation along device implant sites in obturators, inability to hold urine, persistent abdominal pain, persistent abdominal spasms, feels tugging in abdomen when she lays on floor stretched out, more difficulty with bladder evacuation, vaginal pain, urinary urgency, urinary frequency, urge urinary incontinence.Patient had an examination, explantation of device, floseal application, and cystourethroscopy under general anesthesia.Intraoperative findings noted a white mesh noted to be indenting posterior urethra, active bleeding noted from anterior urethral abrasion.Patient had postop inability to void due to severe pelvic floor spasm, introitus almost completely closed and unable to visualize urethra due to spasms.
|
Coloplast has not been provided any corroborating evidence to verify the information contained in this report.Without the benefit of examination and testing, coloplast is precluded from commenting on the condition of the device or the cause of the occurrence.Should additional facts prompt us to alter or supplement any information or conclusions contained in the original mdr or in any prior supplemental reports, a follow-up report will be submitted.
|