As reported to customer relations via pmcf / literature complaint form "as reported to customer relations via pmcf / literature complaint form "final report pancreatic stent pmcf (b)(4) - indication for ercp (endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography) procedure used for placing the study device and the duct study device was placed in are reported in table 3.2-1.Most common indication for the procedure was chronic pancreatitis (53.1%), followed by prophylaxis for post-ercp pancreatitis (pep) (35.9%), and pancreatic stone (33.6%).Most patients (89.1%) had the stent placed in pancreatic duct with close to 10% patients receiving the stent in the biliary ductal system." final report pancreatic stent pmcf (b)(4)- indication for ercp (endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography) procedure used for placing the study device and the duct study device was placed in are reported in table 3.2-1.Most common indication for the procedure was chronic pancreatitis (53.1%), followed by prophylaxis for post-ercp pancreatitis (pep) (35.9%), and pancreatic stone (33.6%).Most patients (89.1%) had the stent placed in pancreatic duct with close to 10% patients receiving the stent in the biliary ductal system.This complaint captures 5 cases of pancreatitis.Related file (b)(4) captures stent migration.
|
Device evaluation: the 05 x zimmon pancreatic stents of unknown lot number and rpn were involved in this complaint.With the information provided, a document-based investigation was conducted.This complaint captures 5 cases of pancreatitis.This file was created in response to pmcf / literature complaint form "final report pancreatic stent pmcf mdr-2062¿.Pr¿s also open in relation to this pmcf study are as follows: pr(b)(4) -pancreatic stent pmcf-off label use.Pr(b)(4) -pancreatic stent pmcf-pain/discomfort and fever.Pr(b)(4) -pancreatic stent pmcf ¿ post-ercp unintended stent migration.Pr(b)(4) -pancreatic stent pmcf-hemhorrage.The device lab evaluation could not be completed as the device, or photographic evidence of the device, was not returned for evaluation.Manufacturing records review: prior to distribution all pancreatic plastic stent devices are subjected to a visual inspection and functional inspection to ensure device integrity.Manufacturing records review could not be completed as the lot number is unknown.Historical data review: historical data was not reviewed as the lot number is unknown.Manufacturing records review: as per the ifu (0055) intended use statement ¿this device is used to drain obstructed pancreatic ducts¿.As per instructions for use, ifu0055 which accompanies this device, potential complications section: "potential complications associated with ercp include, but are not limited to: pancreatitis, cholangitis, perforation, haemorrhage, infection, sepsis, allergic reaction to contrast or medication, hypotension, respiratory depression or arrest, cardiac arrhythmia or arrest.Those associated with biliary stent placement include but are not limited to: trauma to the biliary tract or duodenum, obstruction of the pancreatic duct, stent migration".Pancreatitis is a known potential adverse events associated with an endoscopic procedure (i.E., ercp procedure) during which a plastic biliary or pancreatic stent is being placed.There is no evidence to suggest the customer did not follow the instructions for use.Image review: an image was not returned for evaluation.Root cause analysis: a definitive root cause could not be determined from the available information.A possible root cause could be attributed to the patients pre-existing/underlying conditions.As per instructions for use, pancreatitis is listed as a complication following the use of this device.According to the pmcf study the most common significant adverse event after ercp is post -ercp pancreatitis (pep).Confirmation of complaint: the complaint is confirmed based on customer/or rep testimony.Corrective action/correction: complaints of this nature will continue to be monitored for potential emerging trends.Summary of investigation: failure identified: as per customer/ or rep testimony the 05 x zimmon pancreatic stent case of post-ercp pancreatitis of unknown pancreatic stents pmcf.Confirmed quantity of 05 devices, used.Investigation findings conclude a definitive root cause could not be determined from the available information.A possible root cause could be attributed to the patients pre-existing/underlying conditions.As per instructions for use, pancreatitis is listed as a complication following the use of this device.The complaint is confirmed based on customer/or rep testimony.As per medical advisor¿s input ¿require intervention/additional procedures s=3 or s=4 depeding on how severe the pancreatitis was" complaints of this nature will continue to be monitored for potential emerging trends.
|