Manufacturer¿s ref.No: (b)(4) information regarding patient identifier, date of birth, age, gender, weight, race, and ethnicity were not provided.Section e.1: the initial reporter phone: (b)(6).The initial reporter email address was not available / reported.Based on complaint information, the device was not available to be returned for analysis.Lake region medical performed a review of the device history records relative to the manufacturing, inspection, and packaging of the lot 8129991.The history record indicates this product was final inspection tested at lake region medical and was determined to be acceptable.Product analysis cannot be conducted as the product was not returned for analysis.No determination of causes and possible contributing factors could be made.As such, the investigation will be closed.With the information available and without the complaint product available to be returned for analysis, the reported issue documented in the complaint cannot be confirmed through functional evaluation and analysis.Based on the manufacturing documentation review, there is no indication that the event is related to the device manufacturing process.Assignment of root cause for the event remains speculative and inconclusive, based on the limited information provided and without the return of the complaint sample; however, it is possible that clinical and procedural factors, including device manipulation / interaction may have contributed to the reported failure.As part of the post market surveillance program, information from this complaint is trended for statistical signals and corrective / preventive action may be triggered at a later time.Since there was no evidence to suggest the event was related to a manufacturing or design issue, no corrective actions will be taken at this time.This is one of 2 products involved with the reported complaint.The associated manufacturer report numbers are: 3008114965-2023-00679.This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by cerenovus, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, cerenovus, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.Missing information from this report is identified as blank; this information was not provided in the reported event or available at the time of report submission.The manufacturer will submit a supplemental report if new facts arise which materially alter information submitted in a previous mdr report.Additional information will be submitted within 30 days of receipt.
|
The healthcare professional reported that during an endovascular embolization procedure, the complaint stent, a 4mm x 23mm enterprise 2 stent (encr402312 / 8129991) became impeded in the distal end of the concomitant prowler select plus microcatheter (606s255x / lot# unknown) and could not pass through the microcatheter.The physician tried to withdraw the stent, but it could not be retracted.The physician removed the stent and the microcatheter from the patient¿s anatomy and replaced them with new devices (competitor brand(s)) to complete the procedure.There was no report of any negative patient impact.On 22-sep-2023, additional information was received.The information indicated that the procedure was targeting a middle cerebral artery (mca) bifurcation aneurysm.When the enterprise stent was removed from the patient, it was still on the delivery wire.The stent / stent delivery system did not appear damaged.A continuous flush had been maintained through the microcatheter.No other device went through the same microcatheter before the stent.There were no visible kinks or other damages observed on the microcatheter.Nothing unusual was noted about the system prior to use.The information confirmed there was no negative patient impact.The reported issue did not result in any clinically significant delay in the procedure.
|