• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: US SURGICAL PUERTO RICO ENDO GIA ULTRA; STAPLE, IMPLANTABLE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

US SURGICAL PUERTO RICO ENDO GIA ULTRA; STAPLE, IMPLANTABLE Back to Search Results
Model Number EGIAUSTND
Device Problems Entrapment of Device (1212); Retraction Problem (1536); Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problem Tissue Breakdown (2681)
Event Date 09/19/2023
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
D10 concomitant products: scd7a39, sonicision 7 dissector scd7a39 39 cm, (lot #30190030x); egia60amt, egia60amt egia 60 artic med thick sulu, (lot #p3d0137).Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
According to the reporter, intra-operatively of a laparoscopic restorative proctectomy, when attempting to resect the area of disease in the lower rectum, the device fired the staples but the surgeon was then unable to retract the blade or open the jaws after firing.The stapler was locked closed on the large bowel and would not open.The surgeon subsequently had to change the plan and take a perineal approach in order to release the locked stapler.The surgical time was extended for 30 minutes or more.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Additional information: h3 evaluation summary: medtronic conducted an investigation based upon all information received.The device was available for evaluation.Visual inspection noted the instrument came with a reload attached to it, the reload was fully fired, the instrument firing knobs were fully retracted, the reload was in the clamped position and the articulation lever was in neutral position.Functionally, the attached reload was removed from the device using not normal means.The instrument was successfully loaded with a reload.During the firing cycle, a skip was audible in the firing stroke.An access hole was cut into the instrument body for visualization of the firing rack.It was reported that the jaws of the device remain closed on tissue and after firing the device, there was resistance while attempting to retract the knife.The reported issues were confirmed.The most likely cause was not traced to the device.The evaluation detected an unreported condition: the instrument was loaded and clamped but would not cycle due to sheared firing rack teeth damage.The product analysis noted evidence that the device was not used as intended.The issue can occur in any of the following circumstances: firing over tissue that is beyond the recommended thickness range, firing with an obstacle incorporated in the jaws or attempting to fire a reload that is in interlock.In each circumstance, it will become increasingly difficult to actuate the firing handle and the instrument return knobs will be difficult to retract.In addition, staples may not form properly, and tissue may not be fully transected.The manufacturing records for each device are thoroughly reviewed prior to release to ensure that it meets all medtronic quality specifications.The instructions included with this device provide the following guidance: preoperative radiotherapy may result in changes to tissue.These changes may, for example, cause the tissue thickness to exceed the indicated range thickness for the staple size.Careful consideration should be given to any pre-surgical treatment the patient may have undergone and in corresponding selection of staple size.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ENDO GIA ULTRA
Type of Device
STAPLE, IMPLANTABLE
Manufacturer (Section D)
US SURGICAL PUERTO RICO
201 sabanetas industrial park
ponce PR 00716 4401
Manufacturer (Section G)
US SURGICAL PUERTO RICO
201 sabanetas industrial park
ponce PR 00716 4401
Manufacturer Contact
justin ellis
8200 coral sea st ne
mounds view, MN 55112
7635265677
MDR Report Key17931808
MDR Text Key325624489
Report Number2647580-2023-04427
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code GDW
UDI-Device Identifier10884523003543
UDI-Public10884523003543
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K111825
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Other,Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 11/17/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received10/13/2023
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberEGIAUSTND
Device Catalogue NumberEGIAUSTND
Device Lot NumberP3D0463
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer10/02/2023
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received10/27/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured04/27/2023
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Treatment
SEE H10
Patient Age71 YR
Patient SexMale
Patient Weight116 KG
-
-