• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION JETSTREAM XC; CATHETER, PERIPHERAL, ATHERECTOMY

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION JETSTREAM XC; CATHETER, PERIPHERAL, ATHERECTOMY Back to Search Results
Model Number 45007
Device Problems Entrapment of Device (1212); Stretched (1601); Mechanical Jam (2983)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 10/02/2023
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
It was reported that guidewire entrapment occurred.The target lesions were located in the mid superficial femoral artery (sfa) just distal to a previously placed stent and in the distal sfa and popliteal artery.A 2.1 mm jetstream xc catheter was selected for an atherectomy procedure.The physician crossed the lesions and placed a non-boston scientific (bsc) filter wire just above the trifurcation.A non-bsc filter was placed over the wire.Then the jetstream catheter was advanced to treat both of the lesions.Two passes were made with blades down follow by a blades-up pass in the distal stent.No significant resistance was felt.The wire was removed from the gard and rexed back to then address the more proximal lesion.Two passes were made with blades down followed by a pass with blades up.The wire was removed from the gard and rexed out until it reached the sheath, then the pin and pull technique was used after that.It was noted that resistance was felt right before the device exited the sheath.While removing the device off of the wire outside of the body, resistance was encountered.The device ultimately became completely stuck on the last 5-10cm of the non-bsc wire.It was attempted to get the wire out of the catheter using forceps, but to no avail.The catheter was completely stuck on the wire and would not budge.The physician ended up cutting the wire just proximal to the jetstream burr.It was noted that the sheath had stretched due to the force used to try to remove it from the wire.The physician then went over that same wire that was cut outside of the body to retrieve the filter which was intact.The damaged wire was removed and replaced with a new wire, and the procedure was continued by treating the lesion with a ranger drug-coated balloon.The proximal lesion was also treated with another drug-coated balloon.The end result was great, and the physician was satisfied with the overall result.There was no harm to the patient, and nothing was left inside the patient.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
JETSTREAM XC
Type of Device
CATHETER, PERIPHERAL, ATHERECTOMY
Manufacturer (Section D)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
300 boston scientific way
marlborough MA 01752
Manufacturer (Section G)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
model farm road
cork T12 Y K88
EI   T12 YK88
Manufacturer Contact
rachel shields
4100 hamline ave n
arden hills, MN 55112
6512422111
MDR Report Key17939149
MDR Text Key325725176
Report Number2124215-2023-56946
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MCW
UDI-Device Identifier08714729889892
UDI-Public08714729889892
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K133023
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 10/16/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received10/16/2023
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model Number45007
Device Catalogue Number45007
Device Lot Number0031845716
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received10/02/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured06/19/2023
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient SexFemale
-
-