• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDOS INTERNATIONAL SARL TRUESPAN 12 DEGREE PEEK; FASTENER, FIXATION, NONDEGRADABLE, SOFT TISSUE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDOS INTERNATIONAL SARL TRUESPAN 12 DEGREE PEEK; FASTENER, FIXATION, NONDEGRADABLE, SOFT TISSUE Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 228151
Device Problem Material Deformation (2976)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 09/27/2023
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
It was reported by the sales rep in china that during an unspecified surgical procedure on (b)(6)23.The truespan 12 degree peek device sleeve was deformed.Another like device was used to complete the procedure.There was a 45 minute delay in the procedure reported.There were no adverse patient consequences reported.No additional information was provided.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.H10 additional narrative: e3: reporter is a j&j sales representative.Udi: (b)(4).Investigation summary: a photo was returned to depuy synthes mitek for evaluation.The depuy synthes mitek team conducted a visual inspection of the returned photo.Visual analysis of the photo revealed that the distal tip of the white sleeve is damaged.A manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device and no non-conformance's were identified.As part of depuy synthes mitek quality process all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released to approved specifications.Based on the investigation findings, the reported complaint can be confirmed.The possible root cause for the reported failure can be attributed to procedural variables, such handling of the device or product interaction during procedure; an excessive manipulation of the device was applied to the device while insertion, therefore the white sleeve was damaged, however, this cannot be conclusively determined.At this point in time, no corrective action is required, and no further action is warranted.However, depuy synthes mitek will continue to monitor additional complaint information for potential safety signals through complaint trending as part of post market surveillance.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by depuy mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.Investigation summary: the complaint device was received and evaluated.On visual inspection, the device comes in used condition.The distal tip of the white sleeve was found damaged.Both plates are already deployed.The trigger was tested, no issues were found.A manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device 8l25386 number, and no non-conformances were identified.As part of depuy synthes mitek quality process all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released to approved specifications.Based on the investigation findings, the reported complaint can be confirmed.The possible root cause for the reported failure can be attributed to procedural variables, such handling of the device or product interaction during procedure; an excessive manipulation of the device was applied to the device while insertion, therefore the white sleeve was damaged, however, this cannot be conclusively determined.At this point in time, no corrective action is required, and no further action is warranted.However, depuy synthes mitek will continue to monitor additional complaint information for potential safety signals through complaint trending as part of post market surveillance.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
TRUESPAN 12 DEGREE PEEK
Type of Device
FASTENER, FIXATION, NONDEGRADABLE, SOFT TISSUE
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDOS INTERNATIONAL SARL
chemin-blanc 38
le locle 02400
SZ  02400
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDOS INTERNATIONAL SARL
chemin-blanc 38
le locle CH-24 00
SZ   CH-2400
Manufacturer Contact
kate karberg
325 paramount drive
raynham, MA 02767
3035526892
MDR Report Key17949230
MDR Text Key325835917
Report Number1221934-2023-03762
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MBI
UDI-Device Identifier10886705026012
UDI-Public10886705026012
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeCH
PMA/PMN Number
K153667
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,User Facility,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 10/17/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received10/17/2023
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue Number228151
Device Lot Number8L25386
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Date Manufacturer Received11/05/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured06/30/2021
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? Yes
Type of Device Usage Initial
Removal/Correction NumberN/A
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age51 YR
Patient SexFemale
-
-