It was reported that, a plaintiff with left hip degenerative arthritis, underwent a primary bhr procedure on (b)(6) 2012.After experiencing persistent pain they had a revision surgery on (b)(6) 2023, due to failure of the resurfacing procedure, no evidence of infection or metallosis was found.Cement debonding on the undersurface of the femoral cap was noticed.Both resurfacing components were replaced by a zimmer total hip system.The patient was transferred to pacu without complications.No other complications have been reported.
|
H3, h6: it was reported that a left hip revision surgery was performed due to persistent pain and failure of the resurfacing procedure.As of today, the implanted devices, all of which were used in treatment have not been returned for evaluation.Without a definitive batch number, a complete review of the historical complaints data cannot be performed for the cup and the head.A review of historical complaints data was performed using the part numbers and the reported failure modes to evaluate patterns of repeated failures or defects.Similar complaints have been identified for the cup and the head; this failure will continue to be monitored.As no device batch numbers were provided for investigation, manufacturing record review could not be performed.If more information is received, this investigation will be reopened.The review of the most recent ifu found adequate warnings and precautions in relation to the alleged failure modes.A risk management review was performed.The alleged failure modes and associated risks have been anticipated within the risk file and the anticipated risk level is still adequate.No further actions are required at this time.A review of historic escalation actions related to the products and similar complaint events was performed.Following the review, no prior applicable escalation actions were identified.The available medical documents were reviewed.With the limited information provided, the clinical root cause of the reported pain, cement debonding, straw colored fluid and reactive synovium noted intraoperatively cannot be determined.It cannot be concluded that the reported events were associated with a malperformance of the implant.Further patient impact beyond the revision surgery is not anticipated.Based on the information provided, further investigation of the reported complaint cannot be carried out and remains inconclusive.A definitive root cause cannot be determined.Based on the limited information provided we are unable to speculate on specific factors known to contribute to the alleged fault.Should the devices or additional information be received, the complaint will be reopened.Based on this investigation, the need for corrective and preventative actions is not indicated.Health effect - clinical code and medical device problem code.
|