• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: APIFIX LTD. MID-C 95; POSTERIOR RATCHETING ROD SYSTEM

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

APIFIX LTD. MID-C 95; POSTERIOR RATCHETING ROD SYSTEM Back to Search Results
Model Number MID-C 95
Device Problem Break (1069)
Patient Problem Metal Related Pathology (4530)
Event Date 09/22/2023
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Production process analysis: a review of the device history record confirmed that the device was manufactured and tested according to relevant procedures, and shipped according to manufacturer's specifications.User (surgeon and patient) information analysis: patient #559 (pas# (b)(6)) index procedure was performed on (b)(6) 2021.On (b)(6) 2023 apifix was notified that patient #559 (pas# (b)(6)) has a broken implant and is scheduled for revision surgery on (b)(6) 2023.On (b)(6) 2023 the implants were removed.Per the retrieval report, 'the patient was skeletally mature so no device re-implantation was needed.The tissue around t5-t6 was healthy, there was severe, thick metalosis in the t7-t10 region, coating bone, muscle, surrounding implant.Moderate metalosis surrounding the distal apifix screw / bolt / end of device'.The metalosis was classified grade iii.A tissue sample was collected and will be sent for histopathological analysis.It was further reported that there was possible autofusion under the t7-t10 region.  risk assessment: implant breakage can result from trauma, practicing contact or high demand sports, hyper-kyphosis, inserting the pedicle screws in a wrong trajectory which locks the poly-axial joints, not working according to the surgical technique (e.G., minimally invasive approach and/or not using the trial tool properly).Re-operation events are a known risk that was assessed and recorded by the product risk assessment.The risk of mechanical failure of the mid-c mechanism - [implant breakage] has been assessed and found to be acceptable.The implant breakage rate due to any reason is in line with the rate reported in the literature for this type of complication as described in the company's clinical evaluation report.The explanted device is expected to be returned to the manufacturer for analysis.Upon completion of the evaluations, when additional information comes to light, then a supplemental medwatch report will be submitted.
 
Event Description
On (b)(6) 2023 apifix was notified that patient #559 (pas# (b)(6)) has a broken implant and is scheduled for revision surgery on (b)(6) 2023.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Return analysis: the explanted device was returned and was subjected to cleaning, steam sterilizing, and engineering evaluation.The device was obviously fractured in the pole component around the mid-point of the pole.It appears that post fracture the device remained implanted as the fracture plane, inside of body, and side of pole showed signs of wear.The spherical rings appeared in good condition with minimal wear and some light scratches.Multiple fracture initiation sites were able to be observed despite the fracture surface being partially observed.The suspected failure mode is fatique fracture.No wear analysis was performed as the failure mode was obviously fracture.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Follow up 1 was incorrectly submitted for this record.Disregard the text from follow up #1 manufacturer narrative.Follow up 2 (this record) is being submitted to make the correction to health effects impact code.Health effects for this patient - 4627-device explantation.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
On 05-mar-2024 apifix was notified that patient (b)(6) is planned to undergo revision on (b)(6) 2024 on 06-mar-2024 apifx was notified that patient (b)(6) underwent revision surgery, during which a new mid-c and extender was used & a new apifix screw was placed at l2.One of the off-the-shelf polyaxial screws was removed (t8).The explanted device is expected to be returned to the manufacturer and will be evaluated.Following the evaluation, a supplemental medwatch report will be submitted.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
MID-C 95
Type of Device
POSTERIOR RATCHETING ROD SYSTEM
Manufacturer (Section D)
APIFIX LTD.
1 hacarmel st.
yokneam ellit, 20692 07
IS  2069207
Manufacturer (Section G)
APIFIX LTD.
1 hacarmel st.
kochav yokneam bldg
yokneam ellit, 20692 07
IS   2069207
Manufacturer Contact
alan vaisman
1 hacarmel st.
kochav yokneam bldg
yokneam ellit, 20692-07
IS   2069207
MDR Report Key17963940
MDR Text Key326010528
Report Number3013461531-2023-00049
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code QGP
UDI-Device Identifier07290018128015
UDI-Public07290018128015
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
H170001
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type User Facility,Distributor
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date 03/26/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received10/19/2023
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberMID-C 95
Device Catalogue NumberMUS-095-030
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Date Manufacturer Received03/06/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured02/11/2020
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age16 YR
Patient SexFemale
-
-