The following event was reported to ventec by the device's previous manufacturer: "after a period of normal operation, the equipment sparked and began to smell burning.Patient detected a burning smell.¿ there was patient involvement associated with the reported event; however, there was no patient harm as a result of the reported issue.No further details about the patient was provided.In addition, the previous manufacturer advised ventec that the event occurred sometime between (b)(6).The device's previous manufacturer also advised ventec that the udi information for the device was not available, therefore section d4, udi is "unknown".Due to a technical issue with ventec's electronic medwatch submission platform, we are unable to enter ous contacts in our esub form and have instead entered in the domestic (usa) reporter's information.Section d3, manufacturer and section g2, manufacturing site, of this initial medwatch report should actually state: manufacturer name: invacare suzhou manufacturer street 1: no.5 weixi road, sip manufacturer city: suzhou, jiangsu manufacturer country: chn manufacturer postal code: 215121.Section e1, initial reporter, of this initial medwatch should state: reporter first name: unknown reporter last name: unknown reporter facility name: (b)(6).
|