On a regular basis, coaguchek strips of lots currently valid in the market are tested as part of routine retention testing and results have passed the internal inspection.Per product labeling, coaguchek uses human recombinant thromboplastin.Therefore, the comparability to other human recombinant thromboplastins is best, whereas higher deviations can occur with other thromboplastins.However, those higher differences between thromboplastins of different (rabbit, bovine based) origin are not a coaguchek specific issue.Similar differences can be observed when a human recombinant thromboplastin-based laboratory method is compared against several other (rabbit, bovine-based) laboratory methods.The investigation did not identify a product problem.The cause of the event could not be determined.
|
We received an allegation of questionable inr result with coaguchek xs pro meter serial numbers (b)(6) compared to an unknown laboratory reagent.Sample 1 the meter results were (b)(6)- 2.0 inr/23.9 sec, (b)(6)- 2.1 inr/25.2 sec, (b)(6)- 2.1 inr/24.8 sec the result from the laboratory was >16.0 inr/>120.0 sec.Sample 2 the meter results were (b)(6)- 37.9 sec, (b)(6)- 37.6 sec, (b)(6)- 37.8 sec.The result from the laboratory was 28.6 sec.Sample 3 the meter results were (b)(6)- 3.7 inr/44.7 sec, (b)(6)- 3.7 inr/44.0 sec, (b)(6)- 3.7 inr/44.7 sec.The result from the laboratory was 2.7 inr/28.9 sec.Sample 4 the meter results were (b)(6)- 34.4 sec, (b)(6)- 34.7 sec, (b)(6)- 34.4 sec.The result from the laboratory was 25.5 sec.Sample 5 the meter results were (b)(6)- 4.7 inr/56.5 sec, (b)(6)- 4.6 inr/55.4 sec, (b)(6)- 4.6 inr/55.4 sec.The result from the laboratory was 3.0 inr/31.4 sec.Sample 6 the meter results were (b)(6)- 3.5 inr, (b)(6)- 3.4 inr, (b)(6)- 3.4 inr.The result from the laboratory was 2.6 inr.Sample 7 the meter results were (b)(6)- 1.9 inr/22.5 sec, (b)(6)- 1.9 inr/22.3 sec, (b)(6)- 1.9 inr/22.6 sec.The result from the laboratory was 1.6 inr/19.4 sec.Sample 8 the meter results were (b)(6)- 49.4 sec, (b)(6)- 49.4 sec, (b)(6)- 49.2 sec.The result from the laboratory was 34.6 sec.Sample 9 the meter results were (b)(6)- 3.7 inr/44.5 sec,, (b)(6)- 3.7 inr/44.2 sec, (b)(6)- 3.7 inr/44.3sec.The result from the laboratory was 2.8 inr/29.5 sec.Sample 10 the meter results were (b)(6)- 3.5 inr/41.6 sec, (b)(6)- 3.5 inr/41.7 sec, (b)(6)- 3.5 inr/41.5 sec.The result from the laboratory was 2.8 inr/29.8 sec.Sample 11 the meter results were (b)(6)- 3.0 inr/36.4 sec, (b)(6)- 3.1 inr/36.9 sec (b)(6)- 3.1 inr/36.7 sec.The result from the laboratory was 2.78 inr/29.7 sec.Sample 12 the meter results were (b)(6)- 34.7 sec, (b)(6)- 34.8 sec, (b)(6)- 34.9 sec.The result from the laboratory was 26.2 sec.Sample 13 the meter results were (b)(6)- 3.2 inr/38.0 sec, (b)(6)- 3.1 inr/37.7 sec, (b)(6)- 3.2 inr/38.4 sec.The result from the laboratory was 2.6 inr/28.2 sec.Sample 14 the meter results were (b)(6)- 41.3 sec, (b)(6)- 42.0 sec, (b)(6)- 42.1 sec.The result from the laboratory was 32.0 sec.Sample 15 the meter results were (b)(6)- 35.4 sec, (b)(6)- 35.2 sec, (b)(6)- 34.8 sec.The result from the laboratory was 22.8 sec.No therapeutic ranges were provided.
|