Catalog Number UNK SGC |
Device Problem
Failure to Advance (2524)
|
Patient Problem
Perforation (2001)
|
Event Date 09/17/2023 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Event Description
|
It was reported in an article that the patient underwent a mitraclip procedure to treat severe degenerative mitral regurgitation (mr) due to flail of the lateral (p1) scallop with a commissural jet.The transseptal puncture was performed in the mid-position in the bicaval view and in the mid-posterior position in the short-axis view, with a transseptal puncture height of 4 cm.The mitraclip system was noted to have an anterior-to-posterior trajectory (aorta hugger).Correcting the aorta hugger trajectory - using the ¿+¿ knob on the steerable guide catheter to move the guide posteriorly (away from the aorta) and the ¿m¿ knob to move the mitraclip system medially - resulted in loss of height of the mitraclip system from the mitral valve.The loss of height from the mitral valve could not be adequately corrected with posterior steering of the guide catheter and addition of the ¿a¿ knob to move the mitraclip system anteriorly and laterally to the mitral plane.A repeat transseptal puncture was performed with a transseptal height of 5.8 cm.While advancing the mitraclip steerable guide across the interatrial septum through the second transseptal puncture, a septal tear was noted, extending to the first transseptal puncture, thereby again resulting in loss of height from the mitral valve.Despite advanced steering with the a knob and m knob, as well as posterior steering of the guide catheter, an adequate height of the mitraclip system from the mitral valve could not be achieved and the aorta hugger trajectory could not be corrected.The procedure was aborted.Details are listed in the attached article titled, ¿transcatheter edge-to-edge repair with the pascal device for failed mitraclip procedure¿.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Date of event is estimated.The udi number is not known as the part and lot numbers were not provided the device was not returned for analysis.The lot history record (lhr) review was not performed because this incident was based on an article review and no lot information was provided.Additionally, the complaint history review was not performed because this incident was based on an article review and no lot information was provided.Based on available information, the reported failure to advance (low transseptal puncture) associated with the low trajectory was due to the septum tearing, losing device height.The cause of the reported perforation (atrial: no treatment) associated with the septum tear could not be determined.The reported patient effect of perforation, as listed in the mitraclip system instructions for use, is a known possible complication associated with mitraclip procedures.The reported serious injury/ illness/ impairment was a result of case-specific circumstances.There is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to manufacture, design, or labeling.Attachment: article titled "transcatheter edge-to-edge repair with the pascal device for failed mitraclip procedure."na.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|