Catalog Number 214140 |
Device Problem
Unintended Movement (3026)
|
Patient Problem
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
Event Date 10/16/2023 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Event Description
|
It was reported from the sales rep that during pre-op it was observed that the expressew iii w/o hook device top jaw is loose.This event did not occur during surgery.All available information has been disclosed.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.H10 additional narrative: e3: reporter is a j&j sales representative.Udi: (b)(4).As of this date, the device has not been returned for evaluation; therefore, the reported condition cannot be confirmed and/or duplicated.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.D9, h3, h6: the actual device has been returned and is currently pending evaluation.Once the device has been evaluated, a supplemental medwatch report will be sent accordingly.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.H10 additional narrative: investigation summary: the product was returned to mitek for evaluation.Mitek then conducted visual inspection of the device received.The device was received and evaluated.Visual inspection revealed wear marks on the device as expected in this type of reusables devices.Upon reviewing the upper jaw, it was found that it was loose.To test its functionality, the trigger was fully depressed and the upper jaw could not be closed completely due to its loose condition.Manufacturing record evaluation is not required as the reported event is not associated with the manufacturing process and/or the potential cause of the defect cannot be associated to manufacturing.As part of depuy synthes mitek quality process all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released to approved specifications.Based on the visual inspection findings, this complaint can be confirmed.The possible root cause for the loose jaw can be attributed to procedural variables, such handling of the device or product interaction during procedure, a bigger portion of tissue may have been grabbed and forced the jaw to close, also, since this device is reusable, the continuous use and sterilization process can cause metal fatigue leading to loose and a non-closing jaw, however, this cannot be conclusively determined.As per the instructions for use, it is important to inspect the device prior to use to ensure proper mechanical function and do not use if product is damaged.At this point in time, no corrective action is required, and no further action is warranted.However, depuy synthes mitek will continue to monitor additional complaint information for potential safety signals through complaint trending as part of post market surveillance.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|