Olympus reviewed the following literature titled "delayed perforation after endoscopic resection of a peutz-jeghers-type polyp arising from an inverted appendix." a 31-year-old man was referred for treatment of a cecal pedunculated (0-ip) polyp with a reddish, lobulated, and irregularly surfaced 40 mm head.The thick (10 mm) and long (20 mm) stalk originating from the appendiceal orifice was assumed to be an inverted appendix.After ligating the stalk in the lower third using an olympus endoloop, endoscopic resection was performed above the endoloop without any injection, forced coagulation.Wound closure was achieved using multiple endoclips.The patient was asymptomatic postoperatively, and blood tests on postoperative day one (pod1) showed no abnormalities; however, he developed fever and lower abdominal pain in the afternoon of pod1.Computed tomography revealed fluid retention in the abdomen, indicating delayed perforation.Because the abdominal pain was localized, conservative treatment was initiated with cefmetazole.Blood tests revealed a peak in white blood cells (10,200/mm2) on pod2 and c-reactive protein (23.0 mg/dl) on pod4.Computed tomography on pod6 revealed no additional leakage, and percutaneous drainage was performed for the intra-abdominal abscess.The patient started eating on pod11 and was discharged on pod21.The resected specimen showed a hollow stalk, suggesting full-thickness resection.In this case, the endoloop and endoclips might have dislocated when the inverted appendix returned to its original position after resection, resulting in delayed perforation.This literature article requires 1 report.There is no report of any olympus device malfunction in any procedure described in this study.
|
This report is being supplemented to provide additional information based on the legal manufacturer's final investigation.The device history record was unable to be reviewed for this device since the serial and/or lot number was not provided.However, olympus only releases products to market that meet all manufacturing specifications and final product release criteria.Based on the results of the investigation, the relationship between the device and the adverse event cannot be confirmed.There was no complaint reported on the subject device.There is no evidence of an olympus device malfunction.Therefore, the root cause cannot be determined.This supplemental report includes information added to b5.Olympus will continue to monitor field performance for this device.
|