|
Model Number RSINT30030X |
Device Problem
Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
Patient Problems
Perforation (2001); Insufficient Information (4580)
|
Event Date 09/28/2023 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Event Description
|
An attempt was made to use one 3.0x30mm resolute integrity coronary drug eluting stent to treat a lesion in the proximal/mid left anterior descending (lad) artery during a multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention (pci).The device was inspected with no issues.Negative prep was performed with no issues.The lesion was pre-dilated.The device did not pass through a previously deployed stent.Resistance was not encountered when advancing the device.Excessive force was not used.It was reported that stent perforation occurred during the procedure which caused damage to artery of the patient.The perforation happened only with the 3.0x30mm stent.The perforation was treated by being covered with another 3.5x30mm resolute integrity stent and a non-medtronic covered stent.A 2.25x30mm resolute integrity stent, was used in the same procedure in the distal lad.A 2.75x30mm resolute integrity stent, was used to treat the left circumflex/obtuse marginal (lcx/om) artery.A 2.5x22mm resolute integrity stent, was used to treat the distal right coronary artery (rca).And a 3.0x38mm resolute integrity stent, was used to treat the mid rca.There is no complaint against any of the other resolute integrity stents.The patient is alive with no further injury.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Image analysis: four fluoroscopic images were provided for review.The first image shows the left coronary system prior to treatment.The next image shows the lad with the first 2.25x30mm resolute integrity stent successfully deployed in the vessel, with the delivery of the 3.0x30mm resolute integrity stent to overlap with the initial stent.The latter half of the second set of images shows the reported perforation.The 3.0 x 30mm resolute integrity stent does not appear to have been deployed at this stage but the location of the perforation appears to be on the proximal end of the deployed stent where the 2nd 3.0 x 30mm resolute integrity stent was being positioned.The mechanism of perforation cannot be confirmed.The third image shows the delivery of the non-medtronic covered stent to treat the perforation.And the final image shows the successful deployment of all stents with timi 3 flow throughout the lad.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Additional information: the lesion was moderately calcified, moderately tortuous with 90% stenosis and located in the mid left anterior descending (lad) artery.Initial reporter's phone number updated.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|