The device was not returned for evaluation.A review of the lot history record identified no manufacturing nonconformities issued to the reported lot that would have contributed to this event.Additionally, a review of the complaint history identified no other similar incidents and/or complaints from this lot.The investigation was unable to determine a conclusive cause for the reported inflation issue; however, the separation appears to be related to operational context.There is no indication of a product quality issue with respects to the design, manufacture, or labeling of the device.
|
It was reported that the procedure was to treat a de novo lesion in the common iliac artery.The 10x40mm armada balloon dilatation catheter (bdc) was used for post-dilation of a stent graft; however, the balloon failed to inflate.Therefore, the bdc was removed from the patient and the balloon was noted to be separated.It was confirmed that the separated balloon was removed with the bdc.Another same size armada was used to complete the procedure.There was no adverse patient effect and no clinically significant delay reported in the procedure.No additional information was provided.
|
Visual, and functional inspections were performed on the returned device.The reported inflation issue and balloon separation were not confirmed.The investigation was unable to determine a conclusive cause for the reported inflation issue or balloon separation.However, possible factors that may contribute to difficulty inflating may include, but are not limited to, manufacturing, poor connection with the inflation device, damage to the inflation lumen, patient anatomical morphology and patient disease state.Additionally, possible factors that may contribute to a balloon separation may include, but not limited to, manufacturing damage, interaction with the anatomy, user attempts to remove against resistance and physician applies excessive force against resistance.In this case, a conclusive cause for the reported inflation issue and a balloon separation could not be determined since the complaints could not to be confirmed during return analysis.There is no indication of a product quality issue with respects to the design, manufacture, or labeling of the device.H3: the device was initially reported as discarded; however, it was returned for analysis.H6: type of investigation code 4115 was removed.H6: investigation findings code 3221 was removed.
|