• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: SHIRAKAWA OLYMPUS CO., LTD. EVIS EXERA II ULTRASOUND GASTROVIDEOSCOPE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

SHIRAKAWA OLYMPUS CO., LTD. EVIS EXERA II ULTRASOUND GASTROVIDEOSCOPE Back to Search Results
Model Number GF-UCT180
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problems Hemorrhage/Bleeding (1888); Unspecified Infection (1930); Pancreatitis (4481)
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
The specific model number is unknown, gf-uct180 was chosen as a representative device.The investigation is ongoing.A supplemental report will be submitted upon completion of the investigation.This report was submitted by the importer under the importer's report number 2429304-2023-00340.A copy of the literature is attached.
 
Event Description
Olympus reviewed the following literature titled "endoscopic ultrasound-guided versus percutaneous drainage for the management of post-operative fluid collections after distal pancreatectomy" methods: adults who underwent distal pancreatectomy from january 2012 to august 2021 and developed symptomatic popfc in the resection bed were retrospectively identified from a single academic center database.Demographic data, procedural data, and clinical outcomes were abstracted.Clinical success was defined as symptomatic improvement andradiographic resolution without requiring an alternate drainage modality.Quantitative variables were compared using a two-tailed t-test and categorical data were compared using chi-squared or fisher¿s exact tests.Results: of 1046 patients that underwent distal pancreatectomy, 217 met study inclusion criteria (median age 60 years, 51.2% female), of whom 106 underwent eusd and 111 ptd.There were no significant differences in baseline pathology and popfc size.Ptd was generally performed earlier after surgery (10 vs.27 days; p < 0.001) and more commonly in the inpatient setting (82.9% vs.49.1%; p < 0.001).Eusd was associated with a significantly higher rate of clinical success (92.5% vs.76.6%; p = 0.001), fewer median number of interventions (2 vs.4; p < 0.001), and lower rate of popfc recurrence (7.6% vs.20.7%; p = 0.007).Aes were similar between eusd (10.4%) and ptd (6.3%, p = 0.28), with approximately one-third of eusd aes due to stent migration.¿type of adverse events/number of patients in eusd group¿ moderate bleeding - 2 patients severe bleeding - 1 patient infection (moderate) - 1 patient pancreatitis (moderate) - 1 patient in patients who died before follow-up, a family member or power of attorney was contacted to gather information regarding the date and cause of death and recorded in the electronic medical record.Four patients in the eusd group (3.6%) died within 6 months of the index procedure from non-procedure related causes, which was assessed as non-reportable.There is no report of any olympus device malfunction in any procedure described in this study.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
This report is being supplemented to provide additional information based on the legal manufacturer's final investigation.The device history record was unable to be reviewed for this device since the serial and/or lot number was not provided.However, olympus only releases products to market that meet all manufacturing specifications and final product release criteria.Based on the results of the investigation, the relationship between the device and the adverse event cannot be confirmed.There was no complaint reported on the subject device.There is no evidence of an olympus device malfunction.Therefore, the root cause cannot be determined.Olympus will continue to monitor field performance for this device.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
EVIS EXERA II ULTRASOUND GASTROVIDEOSCOPE
Type of Device
ULTRASOUND GASTROVIDEOSCOPE
Manufacturer (Section D)
SHIRAKAWA OLYMPUS CO., LTD.
3-1 okamiyama
odakura, nishigo-mura,
nishishirakawa-gun, fukushima 961-8 061
JA  961-8061
Manufacturer (Section G)
SHIRAKAWA OLYMPUS CO., LTD.
3-1 okamiyama
odakura, nishigo-mura,
nishishirakawa-gun, fukushima
Manufacturer Contact
todd brill
800 west park drive
westborough, MA 01581
5082077661
MDR Report Key18035498
MDR Text Key326915112
Report Number3002808148-2023-11999
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code ODG
UDI-Device Identifier04953170356339
UDI-Public04953170356339
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K093395
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Study,Literature,Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 11/07/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received10/30/2023
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberGF-UCT180
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Date Manufacturer Received11/06/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
-
-