The customer contacted stryker to report that their cpr device was used on a patient, however the patient did not survive.At confirmation of the death of the patient, a ct scan of patient revealed that the aorta was damaged.In addition, because the cpr device had continued compression until the patient death was confirmed while the sternum height of the dead body was about 13-14cm, which was less than 17cm as the minimum value of the usable sternum height, the hospital requests that stryker to investigate if the cpr device worked without problem when it was used for the patient.The doctor said that since the patient had cardiogenic disease, it was foreseeable that she would die sooner or later, but we can neither confirm nor deny whether or not this vascular injury hastened her death.
|
Stryker evaluated the customer's device and could not duplicate or verify the reported issue.The device functioned properly.After other unrelated repairs were completed, proper device operation was observed through functional and performance testing.The device was returned to the customer for use.The cause of the reported issue could not be determined.A clinical review of the reported event was performed.The clinical review concluded, "with the information received it can not be excluded that lucas could have caused the damage to the aorta.However, it can neither confirm nor deny whether this damage to the aorta hastened the patient`s death.".
|