• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS, INC. DIAMONDBACK 360 PERIPHERAL ORBITAL ATHERECTOMY SYSTEM; PERIPHERAL ATHERECTOMY DEVICE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS, INC. DIAMONDBACK 360 PERIPHERAL ORBITAL ATHERECTOMY SYSTEM; PERIPHERAL ATHERECTOMY DEVICE Back to Search Results
Model Number DBP-125MICRO145
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problems Perforation of Vessels (2135); Vascular Dissection (3160)
Event Date 10/09/2023
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
A diamondback 360 peripheral orbital atherectomy device (oad) was used for an atherectomy procedure.A perforation was observed.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The investigation is ongoing.A final report will be submitted once the investigation is complete.Csi id: (b)(4).
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Updated fields: b4, d4, d9, g3, g6, h2, h3, h4, h6, h6 investigation conclusion code 22: the diamondback 360® peripheral orbital atherectomy system instructions for use manual states that vessel perforation is a potential adverse event that may occur and/or require intervention with use of the system.H6: investigation findings code: 4247 - suggested code is biological material present on device.The oad was returned for analysis.Examination of the driveshaft crown section identified adhered biological material.It was unable to be determined whether the adhered biological material was related to the perforation.The morphology and exact root cause of the biological material was unknown.Examiniation of the crown did not reveal any damage or abnormalities that could have led to the perforation.The crown diameter was measured and met specification.The root cause of the perforation was unable to be conclusively determined.The device history record for this oad lot number has been reviewed.No issues or discrepancies were noted during this review that would have contributed to the reported event.The device met material, assembly, and quality control requirements.Csi id: (b)(6).
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Updated fields: b4, b5, g2, g3, g6, h2, h6.
 
Event Description
Additional information received indicated during the procedure, the oad arrested on the viperwire advance guide wire and was unable to be removed.An advanced technique was used to remove the oad and guide wire.A proximal anterior tibial dissection was observed.Balloon angioplasty was used to treat the dissection, and subsequently complete the procedure.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
DIAMONDBACK 360 PERIPHERAL ORBITAL ATHERECTOMY SYSTEM
Type of Device
PERIPHERAL ATHERECTOMY DEVICE
Manufacturer (Section D)
CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS, INC.
1225 old hwy 8 nw
st. paul MN 55112
Manufacturer (Section G)
CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS, INC.
1225 old hwy 8 nw
st. paul MN 55112
Manufacturer Contact
aaron stevens
1225 old hwy 8 nw
st. paul, MN 55112
MDR Report Key18058259
MDR Text Key327201703
Report Number3004742232-2023-00270
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MCW
UDI-Device Identifier10850000491172
UDI-Public(01)10850000491172(17)241031(10)458781-1
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K190634
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Other,Health Professional
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 04/09/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received11/02/2023
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberDBP-125MICRO145
Device Catalogue Number7-10057-01
Device Lot Number458781-1
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received04/04/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured10/24/2022
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
Patient Age62 YR
Patient SexMale
-
-