Lot Number 0029219462 |
Device Problems
Break (1069); Difficult to Remove (1528); Failure to Advance (2524)
|
Patient Problem
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
Event Date 10/11/2023 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that removal difficulties and a shaft break occurred.On (b)(6) 2023, a 3.50 x 12mm synergy drug-eluting stent (des) was implanted in the left main trunk (lmt) to left anterior descending artery (lad) without any issues being encountered.On (b)(6) 2023, presented for treatment of the 95% stenosed target lesion located in the moderately tortuous and moderately calcified mid lad.Following pre-dilation, the 2.50 x 38 mm synergy xd des was advanced but was unable to cross the target lesion.A non-boston scientific (non-bsc) guide extension catheter was used to try to cross the lesion but the 2.50 x 38 mm synergy xd got stuck at the previously implanted 3.50 x 12mm synergy stent and was unable to cross.An attempt was made to remove the 2.50 x 38mm synergy xd in order to perform more pre-dilation.However, when the stent was pulled forcefully, the shaft was separated mid shaft and remained in the guide extension catheter.A 2.0 mm non-bsc balloon was inserted into the guide extension catheter and inflated to remove the detached shaft.It was noted that the previously implanted stent was explanted and also removed.The physician thought the guide extension catheter might have damaged the implanted stent and that was why it got stuck.After confirmation under fluoroscopy and intravascular ultrasound, the decision was made to continue treatment.Stenting was done from the lesion to the site of the explanted stent to successfully complete the procedure.There was no injury to the patient.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that removal difficulties and a shaft break occurred.On (b)(6) 2023, a 3.50 x 12mm synergy drug-eluting stent (des) was implanted in the left main trunk (lmt) to left anterior descending artery (lad) without any issues being encountered.On (b)(6) 2023, presented for treatment of the 95% stenosed target lesion located in the moderately tortuous and moderately calcified mid lad.Following pre-dilation, the 2.50 x 38 mm synergy xd des was advanced but was unable to cross the target lesion.A non-boston scientific (non-bsc) guide extension catheter was used to try to cross the lesion but the 2.50 x 38 mm synergy xd got stuck at the previously implanted 3.50 x 12mm synergy stent and was unable to cross.An attempt was made to remove the 2.50 x 38mm synergy xd in order to perform more pre-dilation.However, when the stent was pulled forcefully, the shaft was separated mid shaft and remained in the guide extension catheter.A 2.0 mm non-bsc balloon was inserted into the guide extension catheter and inflated to remove the detached shaft.It was noted that the previously implanted stent was explanted and also removed.The physician thought the guide extension catheter might have damaged the implanted stent and that was why it got stuck.After confirmation under fluoroscopy and intravascular ultrasound, the decision was made to continue treatment.Stenting was done from the lesion to the site of the explanted stent to successfully complete the procedure.There was no injury to the patient.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Device evaluated by mfr.: synergy xd mr ous 2.50 x 38mm stent delivery system was returned for analysis.Visual, tactile and microscopic analysis was performed on the device.The stent was moved distally on the balloon with signs of damage along the entire length of the stent.Examination of the hypotube shaft identified multiple hypotube kinks.Examination of the outer and inner lumen and mid-shaft section found a break in the polymer extrusion at the site of the guidewire port exchange.The polymer extrusion was also stretched distal to the port exchange and therefore the guidewire the device was returned on, could not be removed.Stent struts stretched and bunched from mid-section and pulled over balloon cone and tip of device, stent outer diameter (od) could not be measured.The stent od at the time of manufacturing was within maximum crimped stent profile measurement.No other device issues were identified during returned product analysis.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|