It was reported that a versacross connect transseptal dilator was selected for use during a watchman case.Prior to the procedure, the mechanical guidewire was inserted inside the versacross dilator for test three times and it worked perfectly.Then, the mechanical guidewire was advanced into the versacross dilator, which was manually shaped to optimize the angle needed (the mechanical guidewire was inside the dilator).Then, at the beginning of the procedure, during initial groin access, once tracked up in patients anatomy, the mechanical guidewire was not able to either advance or withdraw from the versacross dilator.Therefore, both devices were removed and a new versacross kit was opened to be used (versacross rf wire from the first kit along with the new versacross dilator).No relevant information about the patient anatomy was noted.There is no reason to suspect the use of excessive force at the access site.The mechanical guidewire was removed from the patients body along with dilator, in one piece.The distal end of mechanical guidewire was protruding from the dilator.No damage to the dilator was noticed.The coil or either end of the coil were able to be stretched freely.No patient complications were reported.The procedure was completed successfully.The device is not expected to be returned for analysis.
|