• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ABBOTT MEDICAL AMPLATZER PICCOLO; OCCLUDER, PATENT DUCTUS, ARTERIOSUS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ABBOTT MEDICAL AMPLATZER PICCOLO; OCCLUDER, PATENT DUCTUS, ARTERIOSUS Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 9-PDAP-05-04-L
Device Problems Migration or Expulsion of Device (1395); Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method (2017)
Patient Problems Hemorrhage/Bleeding (1888); Obstruction/Occlusion (2422)
Event Date 10/18/2023
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Literature article: left pulmonary artery occlusion following device closure of patent ductus arteriosus in premature infants investigation is not yet complete.A follow-up report will be submitted with all additional relevant informationna.
 
Event Description
The article, "left pulmonary artery occlusion following device closure of patent ductus arteriosus in premature infants", was reviewed.The article presented a case study of a 30-day-old, 1160g, male patient with comorbidities necrotizing enterocolitis (nec) with bowel resection, ileostomy, ventilator dependence, bronchopulmonary dysplasia (bpd), and poor nutrition.It was reported on an unknown date a 5-4mm amplatzer piccolo occluder was chosen for implant to occluder a patent ductus arteriosus (pda) with the following dimensions: narrowest diameter = 3.5mm, largest diameter = 4.5mm, and length = 11.3mm.After initial implant, it was noted the device embolized to the left pulmonary artery (lpa).A decision was made to retrieve the device and it was repositioned and implanted closer to the aortic end of the pda.It was then reported 9 weeks later on an unknown date, a transthoracic echocardiography (tte) showed a suprasystemic right ventricle and no flow to the lpa.A decision was made to perform surgical revascularization via pulmonary arterioplasty where it was noted the 5-4mm amplatzer piccolo occluder's proximal disc was intraductal with the lpa below and completely obstructing the flow.It was then reported three months following reintervention, the patient presented with severe restenois and a decision was made to perform stent angioplasty.The article concluded although rare, severe lpa obstruction can be seen in premature infants following device closure of the pda.The piccolo device is designed to ideally remain entirely intraductal.Although device selection appeared to provide a device short enough for the given ductal length, they recommend, whenever possible, giving consideration to using the shortest possible device.We also recommend increasing the frequency of echocardiographic surveillance to weekly studies if at any time the imaging demonstrates an increase in the degree of obstruction/turbulence.Clinicians should have a low threshold for alternative imaging modalities such as computed tomography or more invasive options if a pattern of increased obstruction is detected.This may allow for a transcatheter based intervention to either retrieve the device, if relatively soon, or stent the lpa, if patient size allows.[the primary and corresponding author was jesus jaile, children¿s hospital of new orleans / lsuhsc, new orleans, louisiana, with corresponding email: jesus.Jaile@lcmchealth.Org].
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Summarized patient outcomes/complications of amplatzer piccolo were reported in a research article in a subject population with multiple co-morbidities including necrotizing enterocolitis (nec) with bowel resection, ileostomy, ventilator dependence, bronchopulmonary dysplasia (bpd), and poor nutrition.Some of the periprocedural complications reported were device embolization, unexpected medical intervention, and improper use and post-procedural complications included surgical intervention, hospitalization, obstruction/occlusion, and hemorrhage ; these complications are anticipated for the procedure and subject population.A more comprehensive assessment could not be performed as the event was non-contemporaneously reported through a literature review and no device or individual patient information was received for analysis.Per the instructions for use, it stated, " warnings: remove embolized devices.Do not remove an embolized occluder through intracardiac structures unless the occluder is fully recaptured inside a catheter.¿accurate measurements of the ductus are crucial for correct occluder size selection." this is considered as an improper or incorrect procedure or method of the device.However, it was unable to determine if an improper or incorrect procedure or method contributed to the reported incident.Therefore, a letter will not be provided to address the deviation from the ifu.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
AMPLATZER PICCOLO
Type of Device
OCCLUDER, PATENT DUCTUS, ARTERIOSUS
Manufacturer (Section D)
ABBOTT MEDICAL
5050 nathan lane n
plymouth MN 55442
Manufacturer (Section G)
ABBOTT MEDICAL REG# 2135147
5050 nathan ln n
plymouth MN 55442
Manufacturer Contact
karen krouse
5050 nathan lane n
plymouth, MN 55442
6517565400
MDR Report Key18120745
MDR Text Key327999128
Report Number2135147-2023-04966
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MAE
UDI-Device Identifier05415067031044
UDI-Public05415067031044
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P020024
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Literature,Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 01/03/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received11/13/2023
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue Number9-PDAP-05-04-L
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received12/13/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention; Hospitalization;
Patient Age30 DA
Patient SexMale
-
-