• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION AXIOS STENT AND ELECTROCAUTERY ENHANCED DELIVERY SYSTEM; PANCREATIC STENT, COVERED, METALLIC, REMOVABLE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION AXIOS STENT AND ELECTROCAUTERY ENHANCED DELIVERY SYSTEM; PANCREATIC STENT, COVERED, METALLIC, REMOVABLE Back to Search Results
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problem Septic Shock (2068)
Event Date 07/01/2017
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
Boston scientific became aware of events involving axios stent and electrocautery enhanced delivery systems through the article, eus-guided choledochoduodenostomy after failed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in distal malignant biliary obstruction, by isabel tarrio, et al.Per the article, a retrospective review was done on patients who underwent eus-guided choledochoduodenostomy (eus-cds) with lumen apposing metal stents (lams) between july 2017 and june 2022.A total of 20 patients (65% male) with a median age of 76 years old (range 57-96) underwent lams placement.In 12 patients, the eus-cds was performed in the same endoscopic sessions, immediately after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ercp) failure.The remaining 8 patients were admitted from other hospitals, in which there were no available technical resources and/or experienced endoscopists in eus-guided biliary drainage.Technical success rate was 100% and the clinical success rate was 89.5% according to the study, 4 out of 20 patients presented with cholangitis in the first 30 days after stent placement procedure, and in one case evolving into septic shock.All cases were medically managed with antibiotics.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Block a2: patient age is approximated based on the median age being 76.Block b3: the exact date of the event is unknown.Approximated based on the month and year the first procedures were performed.Blocks d4 and h4: the complainant was unable to report the upn and lot number; therefore, the manufacture date and expiration date are unknown.Block g2 literature source: tarrio, et al."eus-guided choledochoduodenostomy after failed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in distal malignant biliary obstruction" ge port j gastroenterol 2023; doi: 10.1159/000528808 block h6: imdrf patient code 233605 captures the reportable event of septic shock.Imdrf patient code e1109 captures the reportable event of cholangitis.Imdrf impact code f2303 captures the all cases were medically managed with antibiotics.Imdrf impact code f12 captures the adverse events of cholangitis and septic shock.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
AXIOS STENT AND ELECTROCAUTERY ENHANCED DELIVERY SYSTEM
Type of Device
PANCREATIC STENT, COVERED, METALLIC, REMOVABLE
Manufacturer (Section D)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
300 boston scientific way
marlborough MA 01752
Manufacturer (Section G)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
ballybrit business park
galway
EI  
Manufacturer Contact
carole morley
300 boston scientific way
marlborough, MA 01752
5086834015
MDR Report Key18155019
MDR Text Key328351981
Report Number3005099803-2023-06196
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code PCU
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodePO
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Other,Foreign,Literature,Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 11/16/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received11/16/2023
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received10/23/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age76 YR
Patient SexMale
-
-