• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ST. JUDE MEDICAL ADVISOR¿ HD GRID MAPPING CATHETER, SENSOR ENABLED¿; ELECTRODE RECORDING CATHETER OR ELECTRODE RECORDING PROBE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ST. JUDE MEDICAL ADVISOR¿ HD GRID MAPPING CATHETER, SENSOR ENABLED¿; ELECTRODE RECORDING CATHETER OR ELECTRODE RECORDING PROBE Back to Search Results
Device Problems Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993); No Apparent Adverse Event (3189)
Patient Problems Cardiac Perforation (2513); No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
The following was published in the journal wiley in an article titled, "comparison of pulsed field ablation and cryoballoon ablation for pulmonary vein isolation" jan-hendrik schipper md, received: 1 july 2023 | revised: 18 august 2023 | accepted: 28 august 2023 doi: 10.1111/jce.16056.In this retrospective single-center analysis, all consecutive patients undergoing pfa-based de novo pvi between september 2021 and october 2022 in the setting of paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation (paf and persaf) were analyzed and compared to consecutive patients who underwent de novo pvi using the boston scientific polarx cb system in the same time period.After implementation of pfa, less cb pvi were performed hence, for equal comparison one-third of the enrolled patients underwent cb pvi between february and september 2021.All physicians (five different operators) used pfa for the first time.Data acquisition was performed using an electronic data capture system17 (redcap database).The study was approved by the local ethics committee of the university of cologne and complied with the declaration of helsinki.All patients provided written informed consent.Two pericardial tamponades occurred in the pfa group.Of those two pericardial tamponades reported, one was most likely caused by complex tsp and led to surgical treatment.The other pericardial tamponade occurred on the day after pvi and was managed by pericardiocentesis.
 
Event Description
Two pericardial tamponades occurred in the pfa group.Of those two pericardial tamponades reported, one was most likely caused by complex tsp and led to surgical treatment.The other pericardial tamponade occurred on the day after pvi and was managed by pericardiocentesis.Both physician authors of the literature article confirmed that neither adverse event were the result of abbott device use or procedure.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The results of the investigation are inconclusive since the device was not returned for analysis.Based on the information received, the cause of the reported incident could not be conclusively determined.Both physician authors of the literature article confirmed that neither adverse event were the result of abbott device use or procedure, making this event not reportable.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ADVISOR¿ HD GRID MAPPING CATHETER, SENSOR ENABLED¿
Type of Device
ELECTRODE RECORDING CATHETER OR ELECTRODE RECORDING PROBE
Manufacturer (Section D)
ST. JUDE MEDICAL
5050 nathan lane north
plymouth MN 55442
Manufacturer (Section G)
ST. JUDE MEDICAL
5050 nathan lane north
plymouth MN 55442
Manufacturer Contact
janna parks
5050 nathan lane north
plymouth, MN 55442
6517565400
MDR Report Key18187265
MDR Text Key328736787
Report Number3005334138-2023-00535
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DRF
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeGM
PMA/PMN Number
K172393
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Literature
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 01/17/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received11/21/2023
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Date Manufacturer Received01/15/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-