During the patient's wear period, an arrhythmia was detected by the zio at device that met the requirements for medical doctor notification (mdn).The information was transmitted to irhythm¿s independent diagnostic testing facility (idtf) as expected.However, the investigation found that an error by the certified cardiographic technician (cct) resulted in the arrhythmia being misclassified.Upon discovery of the error, the healthcare provider (hcp) was immediately informed.Irhythm was made aware that the hcp would have consulted the patient for a pacemaker if the arrhythmia was known and that the patient had suffered a stroke.
|
The at device was returned to irhythm, and a clinical report was successfully generated.The device's diagnostic data and logs indicate that no malfunctions were observed during the wear period.The misclassified arrhythmia was not caused by the algorithm, but rather by an error in interpretation by the certified cardiographic technician.This event is being reported per 21cfr 803 as an adverse event /serious injury.This report does not constitute an admission by irhythm that the product described in this report has any defects or has malfunctioned.These terms are included in form fda 3500a and are fixed terms for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.
|