It was reported to boston scientific corporation that an advantage fit blue system device was implanted into the patient during a procedure performed on (b)(6) 2020, for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence and vaginal prolapse.On (b)(6) 2020, the patient was seen post-surgically and noted to have mixed urinary incontinence.The patient reported stress urinary incontinence with coughing, straining, and laughing, and having to wear one pad per day.Although the noted urge urinary incontinence was better, the patient reported nocturnal enuresis happening at least 3 times in the three weeks prior to the appointment.The patient underwent a cystourethroscopy on (b)(6) 2023, to rule out any possibility of mesh exposure to her lower urinary tract.The patient also alleged dyspareunia.On (b)(6) 2023, the patient was seen for consultation on mesh exposure.During the manual examination, vaginal depth and caliber were adequate, allowing two fingers.There was firmness and induration palpable along the anterior vaginal wall, with the foreign mesh being palpable in the left anterior vaginal sulcus.On (b)(6) 2023, the patient underwent a transvaginal mesh resection and the excision of polypropylene mesh from the vaginal lumen.The patient was examined under anesthesia, with findings demonstrating a 2 cm segment of the polypropylene mesh bridging the left lateral sulcus distal third of the vagina.During the procedure, the surgeon was able to identify the polypropylene mesh essentially bridging the left vaginal sulcus.The surgeon was able to get a right-angle clamp behind the mesh and, with downward traction, visualize both its entry site laterally and its origin medially.A small vaginal incision was made to slightly core the mesh out laterally to a point that could come across it easily deep within the fibromuscular layer of the vagina.During the transection of the sling, the lateral edge retracted significantly and was not long visible or palpable.Traction was continued medially; the adherent fibromuscular tissue was resected from the mesh.The mesh was then transected deep into the vaginal epithelium and the segment was retrieved and sent for gross observation.To date, the patient still experienced urinary issues, a painful bladder, a feeling of fullness, difficulties with urinary incontinence, and dyspareunia.The patient also noted permanent injury and significant mantal, and physician pain and suffering.The patient noted serious bodily injuries, extreme pain, discomfort, urinary problems, dyspareunia, and other injuries related to the mesh device.These injuries will result in some permanent disability for the patient.Additionally, the patient has incurred in economic loss and will continue to incur in expenses related to medical treatment.
|