Catalog Number 80219 |
Device Problems
Break (1069); Stretched (1601)
|
Patient Problem
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
Event Date 10/31/2023 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
H10: the catalog number identified in section d4 has not been cleared in the us but is similar to the rotarex that are cleared in the us.The pro code and 510 k number for the rotarex are identified in d2 and g4.H10: the medical device manufacturer (d3) and manufacturing location (g1) for the straub product was selected as unknown due to system limitations.The correct medical device manufacturer and manufacturing location are straub medical us.H10: as the lot number for the device was provided, a review of the device history records is currently being performed.The return of the sample is pending.However, photos were provided for review.The investigation of the reported event is currently underway.H11: section a through f ¿ the information provided by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that during a recanalization procedure in the superficial femoral artery, the mid-section of catheter allegedly fractured.There was no reported patient injury.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
H10: the catalog number identified in section d4 has not been cleared in the us but is similar to the rotarex that are cleared in the us.The pro code and 510 k number for the rotarex are identified in d2 and g4.H10: the medical device manufacturer (d3) and manufacturing location (g1) for the straub product was selected as unknown due to system limitations.The correct medical device manufacturer and manufacturing location are straub medical us.H10: manufacturing review: a manufacturing review was conducted and there was nothing found to indicate there was a manufacturing related cause for this event.Investigation summary: the sample was returned for evaluation and a physical investigation was performed for the catheter.During physical investigation helix was peeking out 3 cm distance from the tip of the catheter.The tube was ruptured at 53 cm distance from the tip of the catheter.The helix was uncovered and found to be deformed - stretched at the place of the tube damage (53 cm from the tip).User reported helix break can not be confirmed.Therefore, the investigation is unconfirmed for the reported helix break.However, the investigation is confirmed for the identified stretched.The definitive root cause could not be determined based upon available information.Labeling review: as the reported event did not allege a labeling or use related issue, a labeling review is not required.H10: g3, h6 (device) h11: h6 (method, result, conclusion) h11: section a through f ¿ the information provided by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that during a recanalization procedure in the superficial femoral artery, the mid-section of the catheter was allegedly fractured.There was no reported patient injury.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|