|
Model Number SIG45CTAVM |
Device Problems
Entrapment of Device (1212); Retraction Problem (1536)
|
Patient Problem
Tissue Breakdown (2681)
|
Event Date 11/03/2023 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Event Description
|
According to the reporter, during an open lung transplant procedure, after firing, the handle locked up while retracting knife blade and knife blade would not retract.The jaws of the device were locked on tissue.The surgeon had to take another handle and reload to transect out the stapler off of patient.There was unanticipated tissue loss.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
D10 concomitant product: egiaustnd endogia ultra univ std stap (lot#: p3f0222) medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Evaluation summary: medtronic conducted an investigation based upon all information received.The device was available for evaluation.Visual inspection noted pushers being sub-flush, as well as damage to the inside of the anvil adapter is evidence of firing on over-indicated tissue.Firing on tissue thickness greater than the indicated range for use could lead to increased firing and retraction forces, which could simulate difficulty retracing the knife.It was reported that the handle locked up while retracting knife blade and knife blade would not retract.The jaws of the device were locked on tissue.The reported issues were confirmed.The product analysis noted evidence that the device was not used as intended.The manufacturing records for each device are thoroughly reviewed prior to release to ensure that it meets all medtronic quality specifications.The instructions included with this device provide the following guidance: pushers being sub-flush, as well as damage to the inside of the anvil adapter is evidence of firing on over-indicated tissue.Firing on tissue thickness greater than the indicated range for use could lead to increased firing and retraction forces, which could simulate difficulty retracing the knife.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Evaluation summary: medtronic conducted an investigation based upon all information received.The device was available for evaluation.Functional testing found the instrument firing knobs were forcefully retracted and the reload was unloaded from the instrument.The reload was loaded into a representative instrument.The interlock was overridden, was applied to test media, and was cycled without hesitation or binding.The reload interlock was tested and found to function properly.It was reported that the knife blade would not retract and the jaws of the device were locked on tissue.The reported issues were confirmed.The product analysis noted evidence that the device was not used as intended.This issue can occur when firing on tissue thickness greater than the indicated range for use could lead to increased firing and retraction forces, which could simulate difficulty retracing the knife.The manufacturing records for each device are thoroughly reviewed prior to release to ensure that it meets all medtronic quality specifications.A secondary review of the device history records found no potentially contributing factors.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|