• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION POLARIS ULTRA; STENT, URETERAL

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION POLARIS ULTRA; STENT, URETERAL Back to Search Results
Model Number M006193132090
Device Problems Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993); Material Split, Cut or Torn (4008)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 10/01/2023
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Block b3: date of event was approximated to (b)(6) 2023, based on the date the manufacturer became aware of the event.Block e1: initial reporter facility name: (b)(6) hospital.Initial reporter address: (b)(6).Block h10: the returned polaris ultra ureteral stent was analyzed, a visual evaluation and magnification noted that the shaft was detached.Additionally, the suture and positioner were not returned.No other problems with the device were noted.The reported event of stent torn material was not confirmed.Taking all available information into consideration, most likely, the device analysis and including the product record review results, the device meets all manufacturing specifications required and passed all the controls and inspections, no abnormalities were reported during the assembly process.It is possible to conclude that this problem could be caused by operational factors.The retrieval line may be removed before placement at the physician's discretion.If the retrieval line is removed using excess force, the stent can get detached during the procedure, affecting the performance of the device.Consequently, affect the performance of the device.For the reported problem of stent torn material was confirmed due to a torn was not detected during the analysis.For this reason, the as analyze code will be no problem detected.Therefore, the most probable root cause is adverse event related to the procedure.
 
Event Description
It was reported to boston scientific corporation that a polaris ultra ureteral stent was used to treat urinary lithiasis using a trans ureteral lithotripsy procedure in the urinary tract.The event date was unknown.During the procedure, the stent was found damaged.It was noted that the pigtail flap was separated.The procedure was successfully completed with another polaris ultra ureteral stent.There were no patient complications reported as a result of this event.Investigation results revealed that the stent was detached/separated, therefore this event has been deemed an mdr reportable event.Please see block h10 for full investigation details.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
POLARIS ULTRA
Type of Device
STENT, URETERAL
Manufacturer (Section D)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
300 boston scientific way
marlborough MA 01752
Manufacturer (Section G)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
2546 calle primera
alajuela
CS  
Manufacturer Contact
farshad fahimi
4100 hamline avenue north
building c
saint paul, MN 55112
MDR Report Key18279274
MDR Text Key330703177
Report Number3005099803-2023-06456
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code FAD
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeJA
PMA/PMN Number
K010002
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Other,Foreign,Health Professional,Company Representative,Distributor
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 12/06/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received12/06/2023
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberM006193132090
Device Catalogue Number193-132-09
Device Lot Number0031425695
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer11/03/2023
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received11/13/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured02/27/2023
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-