• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BECTON DICKINSON WHITACRE SET 27GA 3-1/2IN; NEEDLE, SPINAL, SHORT TERM

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BECTON DICKINSON WHITACRE SET 27GA 3-1/2IN; NEEDLE, SPINAL, SHORT TERM Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 405075
Device Problem Break (1069)
Patient Problem Foreign Body In Patient (2687)
Event Date 11/13/2023
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
Patient underwent caesarean section on (b)(6) 2023.During a puncture for spinal anesthesia, the 27g whitacre needle was traumatized, and a fragment of the object remained lodged in the patient's spine.This happened on my shift, but i didn't open complaint, because the anesthesiologist himself told the patient and the team that this case could occur because the needle had "hit" the bone and broke during handling.So i understood that it wouldn't be a problem with the material, since the same type of needle was requested to continue the procedure and other procedures took place on the same day, using the same one.I contacted the pharmacy and shared the case with the pharmacist, who also felt that it wasn't a case of opening technovigilance, since the material hadn't been damaged before use.All the material was discarded.Impact on the patient: ".Fragment of the object remains lodged in the patient's spine.Additional information available in the email chain: patient underwent cesarean section on (b)(6) 2023.During puncture for spinal anesthesia, trauma occurs from the 27g withacre needle and a fragment of the object remains lodged in the patient's spine.The suspicion was confirmed through radioscopy and at the same time an evaluation was requested from the back-up neurosurgery team.Doctor attends, evaluates case and recommends removal of foreign body for (b)(6) 2023 at 3:00 pm.On 11/14, after a morning visit by her attending physician, the patient expressed her refusal to undergo a needle fragment removal procedure.Procedure suspended.Later at 9:00 pm on the same day, the doctor proceeds to remove a needle fragment under local anesthesia.I can't find any record of antibiotic prophylaxis before the procedure.____ additional information received on 26.Nov.2023: ¿ could you share the patient's status? a: patient discharged from hospital.¿ what specific information did the anesthesiologist provide about the incident and how it occurred? a: at the time of the incident, the anesthetist informs that problems like this can happen, that the needle could have "hit" the muscle or bone, and even though this event is rare.¿ can you tell us what safety measures were taken after the incident and after surgery? a: scope was performed and a neurosurgeon was called on duty.¿ can you explain why the patient refuses to remove the needle fragment? any specific medical conditions? a: the fragment was removed on 11/14 at 9:30 pm, without any complications.¿ was anvisa notified? if so, what was the notification number? (no response from customer) __ additional information received on 27.Nov.2023: batch number is 2306011.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4): initial mdr submission.A follow up mdr will be submitted if a device evaluation and/or device history review is completed.Patient problem code: e2008 - foreign body in patient f1903 - device explantation device problem code: a0401 ¿ break.
 
Event Description
Patient underwent caesarean section on (b)(6) 2023.During a puncture for spinal anesthesia, the 27g whitacre needle was traumatized, and a fragment of the object remained lodged in the patient's spine.This happened on my shift, but i didn't open complaint, because the anesthesiologist himself told the patient and the team that this case could occur because the needle had "hit" the bone and broke during handling.So i understood that it wouldn't be a problem with the material, since the same type of needle was requested to continue the procedure and other procedures took place on the same day, using the same one.I contacted the pharmacy and shared the case with the pharmacist, who also felt that it wasn't a case of opening technovigilance, since the material hadn't been damaged before use.All the material was discarded.Impact on the patient: ".Fragment of the object remains lodged in the patient's spine.Additional information available in the email chain: patient underwent cesarean section on (b)(6) 2023.During puncture for spinal anesthesia, trauma occurs from the 27g withacre needle and a fragment of the object remains lodged in the patient's spine.The suspicion was confirmed through radioscopy and at the same time an evaluation was requested from the back-up neurosurgery team.Doctor attends, evaluates case and recommends removal of foreign body for (b)(6) 2023 at 3:00 pm.On (b)(6), after a morning visit by her attending physician, the patient expressed her refusal to undergo a needle fragment removal procedure.Procedure suspended.Later at 9:00 pm on the same day, the doctor proceeds to remove a needle fragment under local anesthesia.I can't find any record of antibiotic prophylaxis before the procedure.Additional information received on 26.Nov.2023: could you share the patient's status? a: patient discharged from hospital.What specific information did the anesthesiologist provide about the incident and how it occurred? a: at the time of the incident, the anesthetist informs that problems like this can happen, that the needle could have "hit" the muscle or bone, and even though this event is rare.Can you tell us what safety measures were taken after the incident and after surgery? a: scope was performed and a neurosurgeon was called on duty.Can you explain why the patient refuses to remove the needle fragment? any specific medical conditions? a: the fragment was removed on (b)(6) at 9:30 pm, without any complications.Was anvisa notified? if so, what was the notification number? (no response from customer).Additional information received on 27.Nov.2023: batch number is 2306011.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Pr (b)(4) follow up mdr for device evaluation: one photo which displays the product information was provided, however, no photo or physical sample that display the reported condition were available for investigation.A device history review was performed for reported lot 2306011, no deviations or non-conformances were identified during the manufacturing process that could have contributed to this issue.Three retained samples of the same lot were used for additional evaluation.The product was visually inspected, no damage or defects were observed on any of the needles.Product undergoes visual inspections throughout the manufacturing process according to procedure, verifying there are no defects or damage on the product.Lot release testing results were reviewed for the reported lot and no issues were identified.The details initially provided when reporting this incident indicate the needle broke during procedure due to hitting the bone.Based on the available information, we are not able to identify a root cause related to our manufacturing process at this time.Complaints received for this device and reported condition will continue to be tracked and trended.Our quality team regularly reviews the collected data for identification of emerging trends.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
WHITACRE SET 27GA 3-1/2IN
Type of Device
NEEDLE, SPINAL, SHORT TERM
Manufacturer (Section D)
BECTON DICKINSON
1 becton drive
franklin lakes NJ 07417
Manufacturer (Section G)
BECTON DICKINSON, S.A.
camino de valdeolivia
s/n
san agustin de guadalix IL 60061
Manufacturer Contact
helen cox
75 north fairway drive
vernon hills, IL 60061
8473935694
MDR Report Key18282906
MDR Text Key329943427
Report Number3003152976-2023-00525
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MIA
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeBR
PMA/PMN Number
K210978
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Other,Health Professional
Reporter Occupation Nurse
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 01/08/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received12/07/2023
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue Number405075
Device Lot Number2306011
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received01/08/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured06/14/2023
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age34 YR
Patient SexFemale
-
-