The mayfield modified skull clamp (a1059) was returned for evaluation: device history record (dhr) - the dhr was reviewed and shows no abnormalities related to the reported failure.Failure analysis - the investigation of the returned device found no device deficiencies that would have contributed to the reported complaint.The device passed all specific functional testing requirements except for the lock having rotational movement.When the clamp is properly positioned and put under pressure, it will function properly.The unit is nearly 5 years old and has no service history; therefore it needs a general pm service performed before being returned to the customer.Unit was sent to quality engineering (qe) for further investigation due to patient injury.Qe confirms the findings of the service & repair report and no additional device deficiencies were noted.New components were added to replace worn internal parts, and general maintenance and cleaning were performed.Root cause - evaluation found no device deficiencies that would have contributed to the reported complaint.Probable root cause is improper or suboptimal placement of the skull clamp on the patient.No further investigation required based on the acceptability of risk and no adverse trends identified.This will be monitored and trended going forward.At present, we consider this complaint to be closed.
|
A facility reported that the mayfield modified skull clamp (a1059) released pressure upon placement on the patient's skull, resulting in a cut that required sutures.Additional information received indicates the following: 1.Type of procedure performed.> suboccipital craniectomy, bilateral c1 laminectomy with possible intraop ultrasound, spinal monitoring, tonsillar shrinkage, duraplasty for chiari i decompression.2.Size and location of the cut > bodily injury: 1 inch laceration, left back side of head.3.Was there a delay in surgery due to product problem? > if yes, how long? no case delay 4.Patient outcome.> patient is fine.
|