A facility reported that during a neuro procedure, the pressure gauge of the mayfield modified skull clamp (a1059), would only turn to 40lbs and not 60-80lbs of pressure.Consequently, the patient slipped out of the pins before surgery, prompting re-pinning using an alternative clamp.Additional information received as follows: 1.Please describe the patient's injury.Patient fell out of pins prior to surgery when 40 pounds of pressure was applied.2.Please provide details surrounding the injury.Patient was pinned prior to surgery and fell out immediately after- patient was then re-pinned with a different clamp.4.Please provide patient gender, ethnicity, and race.Will need to get this information early next week.6.Was revision/medical intervention required? if yes, what revision/medical intervention was performed? re-pinned using a different head clamp.7.Was there a delay in surgery due to product problem? if yes, how long? yes, to re-pin.This took around 10 minutes.8.Please provide patient outcome.No injuries- no lacerations.
|
The mayfield modified skull clamp (a1059) was returned for evaluation: device history record (dhr): the dhr was reviewed and shows no abnormalities related to the reported failure.Failure analysis - the investigation of the returned device found no device deficiencies that would have contributed to the reported complaint.Service & repair (s&r) could not duplicate slippage.When the clamp is properly positioned and put under pressure, it would not lose pressure.Unrelated to the complaint issue, the lock had rotational and lateral movement and a residue buildup was present.To resolve all issues, the unit was machined to have heli-coils added to large starburst threads, new components were added to replace worn internal parts, and general maintenance and cleaning were performed.Root cause - evaluation found no device deficiencies that would have contributed to the reported complaint.Probable root cause is improper or suboptimal placement of the skull clamp on the patient.No further investigation is required based on the acceptability of risk and no adverse trends identified.This will be monitored and trended going forward.At present, we consider this complaint to be closed.
|