Title: prevention and management of post-deep inferior epigastric perforator flap abdominal bulge: a 5-year single-surgeon series.The aim of the study was to review the impact of permanent subrectus mesh placement on the incidence of post - diep bulge.All patients who underwent unilateral or bilateral diep breast reconstruction by the senior author between 2015 and 2020 were included in the study.A total of 276 patients were included in the study with 142 in the permanent mesh (pm) group and 134 patients in the non permanent mesh (npm) group.The latter comprised 94 patients who underwent semi-permanent subrectus mesh placement and 40 patients with no mesh.Vypro mesh (ethicon) was used to patients who underwent semi-permanent subrectus mesh placement; 3/0 monocryl suture (ethicon) was used in the rectus muscle fibers at the site of the dissection; 0/0 loop ethilon suture (ethicon) was plicated in a cranio-caudal direction; 2/0 pds (ethicon) was used during the placement of drains and closure of the abdomen and prineo tape (ethicon) was applied in the wound.Reported complications are abdominal bulging/hernia, infection and abdominal weakness.In conclusion, the study demonstrates that a low rate of abdominal morbidity can be achieved with the placement of a permanent subrectus mesh.
|
(b)(4).This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by ethicon inc, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, ethicon inc, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.An attempt has been made to obtain the following information.To date no response has been provided.If further details are received at a later date a supplemental medwatch will be sent.Does the surgeon believe that any of the ethicon products involved caused and/or contributed to the post-operative complications described in the article? which specific ethicon products have been used during the procedures (product code, lot number)? does the surgeon believe there was any deficiency with any of the ethicon products used in this procedure? if so, please provide details.Were the cases discussed in this article previously reported to ethicon? if yes, please provide a complaint reference number.Patient demographics? this report is related to a journal article; therefore, no product will be returned for analysis and the batch history records cannot be reviewed as the lot number has not been provided.H6 component code: g07002 ¿ device not returned.The single complaint was reported with multiple events.There are no additional details regarding the additional events.Citation: journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery 75 (2022) 3683-3689/ https://doi.Org/10.1016/j.Bjps.2022.06.017.Related events captured via 2210968-2023-09592, 2210968-2023-09594, 2210968-2023-09595, 2210968-2023-09596.
|