• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: CORDIS US CORP. SUPER TORQUE MB; CATHETER, INTRAVASCULAR, DIAGNOSTIC

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

CORDIS US CORP. SUPER TORQUE MB; CATHETER, INTRAVASCULAR, DIAGNOSTIC Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 532598B
Device Problem Detachment of Device or Device Component (2907)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 11/06/2023
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
The device is available for analysis but has not yet been received.Additional information is pending and will be submitted within 30 days upon receipt.
 
Event Description
As reported, a 5f 6 side holes (sh) 110cm super torque marker band (mb) pigtail catheter ruptured during endovascular surgery.A lasso was used to extract it.A second pigtail catheter of the same reference and batch was used to finish the procedure and also ruptured, requiring the use of a lasso.The intended procedure was reported to be an aortic endoprosthesis.The target lesion was the aorta.The device was not used for a chronic total occlusion (cto).The products were stored, handled, inspected, and prepped according to the instructions for use (ifu).Additional details were requested; however have not yet been provided.The devices are expected to be returned for analysis.Report (b)(4) was filed with the competent authority by submitter.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
As reported, a 5f 6 side holes (sh) 110cm super torque marker band (mb) pigtail catheter ruptured during endovascular surgery.A lasso was used to extract it.A second pigtail catheter of the same reference and batch was used to finish the procedure and ruptured, requiring the use of a lasso.The intended procedure was reported to be an aortic endoprosthesis.The target lesion was the aorta.The device was not used for a chronic total occlusion (cto).The products were stored, handled, inspected, and prepped according to the instructions for use (ifu).Without the return of the devices or images for analysis, the reported customer event ¿catheter (body/shaft)-separated¿ could not be confirmed for either event.Procedural factors resulting in the elongation and subsequent separation of the catheter may be contributing factors.Users are trained to inspect for signs of damage prior to and during use.Any product with damage is not to be used.Information for safety is provided in the products labeling with the intent to make the user aware of the risks.According to the instructions for use (ifu), although not intended as a mitigation of risk, ¿contraindications: do not use the super torque mb catheter in procedures where entrapment of the catheter between endovascular devices and the vessel wall may occur, for example endovascular aortic repair (evar) procedures.Manipulation of the catheter under excessive friction due to interaction with other devices or while trapped in the vasculature, can lead to stretching or elongation of the catheter.Stretching or elongation of the catheter during endovascular procedures could result in the marker bands moving along the catheter.In extreme cases, marker bands may come off the catheter and dislodge into the vascular system.¿ based on the information available, there is no indication that the event is related to the device design or manufacturing process.Therefore, no preventative or corrective actions will be taken at this time.
 
Event Description
The devices were not returned for evaluation.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
As reported, a 5f 6 side holes (sh) 110cm super torque marker band (mb) pigtail catheter ruptured during endovascular surgery.A lasso was used to extract it.A second pigtail catheter of the same reference and batch was used to finish the procedure and also ruptured, requiring the use of a lasso.The intended procedure was reported to be an aortic endoprosthesis.The target lesion was the aorta.The device was not used for a chronic total occlusion (cto).The products were stored, handled, inspected, and prepped according to the instructions for use (ifu).Two non-sterile cath mb 5f pig 110cm 6sh units were received for analysis.The first unit was analyzed under 04523-1 and the second unit was analyzed under 04523-2.04523-1.During visual analysis, a separated condition was observed on the body of the catheter.Inner diameter (id) and outer diameter (od) measurements were taken near the damages and were found within specification.A high magnification visual analysis was performed along the border of the separation and plastic deformation such as elongation patterns were observed.No further analysis using higher magnification equipment was required as the observed findings presented evidence of a possible inadequate mechanical interaction with the received unit.The reported ¿catheter (body/shaft) ¿ separated¿ was confirmed for both devices.The elongation patterns suggest an excessive tensile strength was applied to the catheter, which may be attributed to the separation.Additionally, the scratch marks observed on the second returned device may be from an interaction between the catheter and a sharp-edged material.Procedural factors such as entrapment of the catheter between endovascular devices and the vessel wall (as suggested by scratch marks) may have contributed to the reported event.Users are trained to inspect for signs of damage prior to and during use.Any product with damage is not to be used.Information for safety is provided in the products labeling with the intent to make the user aware of the risks.According to the instructions for use (ifu), although not intended as a mitigation of risk, ¿contraindications: do not use the super torque mb catheter in procedures where entrapment of the catheter between endovascular devices and the vessel wall may occur, for example endovascular aortic repair (evar) procedures.Manipulation of the catheter under excessive friction due to interaction with other devices or while trapped in the vasculature, can lead to stretching or elongation of the catheter.Stretching or elongation of the catheter during endovascular procedures could result in the marker bands moving along the catheter.In extreme cases, marker bands may come off the catheter and dislodge into the vascular system.¿ based on the available information, there is no indication that the event is related to the device design or manufacturing process.Therefore, no preventive or corrective actions will be taken at this time.
 
Event Description
The device was returned for evaluation.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The device was received for analysis, but the engineering report is not yet available.Additional information is pending and will be submitted within 30 days upon receipt.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
SUPER TORQUE MB
Type of Device
CATHETER, INTRAVASCULAR, DIAGNOSTIC
Manufacturer (Section D)
CORDIS US CORP.
14201 nw 60th avenue
miami lakes, florida 33014
Manufacturer (Section G)
CORDIS US CORP.
14201 nw 60th avenue
miami lakes, florida 33014
Manufacturer Contact
karla castro
santiago troncoso 808
juarez, chihuahua 
7863138372
MDR Report Key18297517
MDR Text Key330114061
Report Number9616099-2023-06658
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DQO
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K915836
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 03/25/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received12/08/2023
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue Number532598B
Device Lot Number18225225
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Date Manufacturer Received03/20/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? No
Date Device Manufactured07/20/2023
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-