Model Number 8145 |
Device Problem
Failure to Conduct (1114)
|
Patient Problem
Failure of Implant (1924)
|
Event Date 11/15/2023 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that the patient underwent revision surgery to replace the reactiv8 system due to the progression of the right lead's out-of-range/high impedance failure over time.The left lead had an out-of-range/high impedance on one electrode but was functional.The left lead and the implantable pulse generator (ipg) were functional but were replaced at the surgeon's discretion.The ipg and left lead were removed intact.The right lead was removed, but the tip was left inside the patient at the surgeon's preference.A new reactiv8 system was implanted with no report of patient harm or injury.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Mml reference #: (b)(4).
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Mml reference # (b)(4).The ipg and two leads were returned for analysis.The ipg passed the functional test.Analysis confirmed lead conductor fractures were the cause of the out-of-range/high impedance conditions observed with the right percutaneous stimulation lead.The left lead failed the functional test.Circuit 2 was open, and visual inspection confirmed a broken wire.The reported issue was verified.Added other device explanted below.Model: 5100; description: reactiv8 implantable pulse generator, serial number: (b)(6), udi: (b)(4).Model: 8145; description: reactiv8 implantable stimulation lead, serial number: (b)(6), udi: (b)(4).
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that the patient underwent revision surgery to replace the reactiv8 system due to the progression of the right lead's out-of-range/high impedance failure over time.The left lead had an out-of-range/high impedance on one electrode but was functional.The left lead and the implantable pulse generator (ipg) were functional but were replaced at the surgeon's discretion due to the right lead being broken.The ipg and left lead were removed intact.The right lead was removed, but the tip was left inside the patient at the surgeon's preference.A new reactiv8 system was implanted with no report of patient harm or injury.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Mml reference # (b)(4) the ipg and two leads were returned for analysis.The ipg passed the functional test.Analysis confirmed lead conductor fractures were the cause of the out-of-range/high impedance conditions observed with the right percutaneous stimulation lead.The left lead failed the functional test.Circuit 2 was open, and visual inspection confirmed a broken wire.The reported issue was verified.Updated h6 codes and b5.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that the patient underwent revision surgery to replace the reactiv8 system due to the progression of the right lead's out-of-range/high impedance failure over time.The left lead had an out-of-range/high impedance on one electrode but was functional.The left lead and the implantable pulse generator (ipg) were functional but were replaced at the surgeon's discretion due to the right lead being broken.The ipg and left lead were removed intact.The right lead was removed, but the tip was left inside the patient at the surgeon's preference.A new reactiv8 system was implanted with no report of patient harm or injury.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|