The product investigation was completed.Device evaluation details: the device was returned to biosense webster (bwi) for evaluation.Visual inspection and temperature and impedance tests of the returned device were performed following bwi procedures.Visual analysis of the returned sample revealed a cut on the pebax with reddish-brown material inside and internal parts exposed; however, the cut could be related to the handling since in the process there are control inspection points to avoid this kind of issue.Then the temperature and impedance tests were performed, and the device was found working correctly.No temperature or impedance issues were observed.The blood found inside the pebax area may contribute to the temperature issue.The instructions for use contain the following recommendations: if the rf (radiofrequency) generator does not display temperature, verify that the appropriate cable is plugged into the rf generator.If the temperature is still not displayed, there may be a malfunction in the temperature sensing system that must be corrected before applying rf power.A manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device 31123353l number, and no internal action was found during the review.The issue reported by the customer was confirmed, and the evaluation determined that the cause of the pebax damage failure cannot be established.As part of biosense webster's quality process, all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released to approved specifications.If additional information is received regarding this event, a supplemental 3500a report will be submitted to the fda.Manufacturer's reference number: (b)(4).
|
It was reported that a patient underwent an atrial fibrillation (afib) ablation procedure with a thermocool® smart touch® sf bi-directional navigation catheter and the bwi product analysis lab identified a cut on the pebax with internal components exposed.During the procedure, the catheter was not displaying a temperature.The cable was replaced without resolution.The cable and the catheter were replaced, and the issue was resolved.It was confirmed that the physician was using the introducer and that there was no visible damage to the ports, cables, or catheters.The procedure continued.No patient consequences were reported.
|