• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: PENUMBRA, INC. RUBY COIL; HCG, KRD

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

PENUMBRA, INC. RUBY COIL; HCG, KRD Back to Search Results
Catalog Number RBY2C1460
Device Problems Break (1069); Physical Resistance/Sticking (4012); Premature Separation (4045)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 11/06/2023
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
The patient was undergoing a coil embolization procedure in the internal iliac artery (iia) using ruby coils and a lantern delivery microcatheter (lantern).It should be noted that the patient¿s anatomy was mildly tortuous.During the procedure, the physician successfully implanted two ruby coils into the target vessel using the lantern.After flushing the lantern, the physician experienced resistance while advancing another ruby coil through the lantern.While attempting to retract the ruby coil, the ruby coil unintentionally detached within the lantern.The physician then attempted to push the detached ruby coil into the target vessel but was unsuccessful.Therefore, the physician decided to remove the lantern containing the ruby coil.Upon removal, the physician fractured the ruby coil pusher assembly.However, the lantern containing the ruby coil was successfully removed from the patient and the ruby coil was then removed from the lantern.The procedure was completed using three ruby coils, seven pod packing coils (pod pc), and the same lantern.There was no report of an adverse effect to the patient.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
This device is available for return.A follow up mdr will be submitted upon completion of the device investigation.H3 other text : placeholder.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Evaluation of the returned ruby coil confirmed that the embolization coil was detached.Evaluation of the ruby coil pusher assembly revealed a fracture, and the introducer sheath had multiple ovalizations.If the ruby coil is advanced against resistance, damage such as a pusher assembly kink may occur.Subsequent retraction against resistance likely worsened the kink to a fracture and caused the pull wire to retract, detaching the embolization coil.Based on the reported event, the root cause of resistance during the procedure could not be determined.The ovalizations on the introducer sheath were likely incidental to the complaint and the root cause could not be determined.Penumbra devices are visually inspected during in-process inspection and during quality inspection after manufacturing.The manufacturing records for this lot were reviewed and did not reveal any outstanding discrepancies, design, or quality concerns.H3 other text: placeholder.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
RUBY COIL
Type of Device
HCG, KRD
Manufacturer (Section D)
PENUMBRA, INC.
one penumbra place
alameda CA 94502
Manufacturer Contact
veronica farris
one penumbra place
alameda, CA 94502
5107483200
MDR Report Key18350155
MDR Text Key331073605
Report Number3005168196-2023-00558
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code HCG
UDI-Device Identifier00814548019116
UDI-Public814548019116
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeJA
PMA/PMN Number
K173614
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Health Professional,Distributor
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 01/01/2005,01/19/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received12/18/2023
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue NumberRBY2C1460
Device Lot NumberF00007836
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? Yes
Date Report Sent to FDA01/01/2005
Date Report to Manufacturer01/10/2005
Date Manufacturer Received01/05/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured08/08/2023
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age75 YR
Patient SexMale
-
-