• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDOS INTERNATIONAL SARL ENTERPRISE2 4MMX23MM; INTRACRANIAL NEUROVASCULAR STENT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDOS INTERNATIONAL SARL ENTERPRISE2 4MMX23MM; INTRACRANIAL NEUROVASCULAR STENT Back to Search Results
Catalog Number ENCR402312
Device Problem Failure to Advance (2524)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 11/29/2023
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Manufacturer¿s ref.No: (b)(4).Information regarding patient identifier and date of birth were not provided.Section e.1: the initial reporter phone: (b)(6).The initial reporter email address was not available / reported.Section h.3: the device is available to be returned for evaluation and testing.However, it has not been received to date as indicated as ¿other¿ in this section as the reason for non-evaluation.If the device returns, a device investigation will be performed.The product analysis team reviewed the photo included in the complaint.The review is documented below.[photo review]: one photo was included in the complaint.The delivery wire of the enterprise system appeared undamaged and is observed inside the prowler select plus microcatheter.The stent component is presumably stuck inside the microcatheter and cannot be observed.The issue reported that the stent could not pass through the microcatheter cannot be evaluated based on the photo; the photo does not provide evidence that there are damages on the enterprise system that may have contributed to the issue encountered during the procedure.Further inspection and testing will be conducted once the complaint devices are returned to the laboratory.Lake region medical performed a review of the device history records relative to the manufacturing, inspection, and packaging of the lot 8028668.The history record indicates this product was final inspection tested at lake region medical and was determined to be acceptable.As part of cerenovus quality process, all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released to approved specifications.This is one of 2 products involved with the reported complaint.The associated manufacturer report numbers are: 3008114965-2023-00913 and 3008114965-2023-00914.This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by cerenovus, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, cerenovus, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.Missing information from this report is identified as blank; this information was not provided in the reported event or available at the time of report submission.The manufacturer will submit a supplemental report if new facts arise which materially alter information submitted in a previous mdr report.Additional information will be submitted within 30 days of receipt.
 
Event Description
The healthcare professional reported that during an angioplasty procedure, the devices were flushed and inspected.The 150cm x 5cm prowler select plus microcatheter (606s255x / 31024383) was placed in the target site and the 4mm x 23mm enterprise 2 stent (encr402312 / 8028668) was delivered to the microcatheter.The stent was impeded in the distal end of the microcatheter and could not pass through the microcatheter.The physician tried to withdraw the stent, but it was stuck in the microcatheter and could not be retracted.The physician removed both devices from the patient¿s anatomy and switched to new devices to complete the procedure.There was no report of any negative patient impact.A photo of the devices was included in the complaint.Additional information was received on 07-dec-2023.Per the information, the procedure was a middle cerebral artery (mca) angioplasty in a 69-year-old female patient with no medical history.When the stent was removed from the patient, it was still on the delivery wire.There was no damage observed on the stent / stent delivery system.A continuous flush had been maintained through the microcatheter.There were no visible kinks nor other damages observed on the microcatheter.Nothing unusual was noted about the system prior to use.The replacement stent was another 4mm x 23mm enterprise 2 stent (encr402312).The replacement microcatheter was another 150cm x 5cm prowler select plus microcatheter (606s255x).The information confirmed there was no negative patient impact.There was no clinically significant delay in the procedure as a result of the reported issue.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Manufacturer¿s ref.No: (b)(4).The purpose of this mdr submission is to report the investigation finding of the returned device.The complaint device was returned for evaluation and analysis.The investigation finding is documented below.Investigation summary: a non-sterile 4mm x 23mm enterprise 2 stent was received contained in the decontamination pouch.Visual inspection was performed.It was observed that the delivery wire remained inside the concomitant microcatheter.The introducer component was not returned for evaluation.The concomitant microcatheter was flushed in attempt to remove the enterprise stent; however, strong resistance was felt.The microcatheter was dissected at different points; dried clots, and residues of dried blood were found in the inner lumen.The delivery system could not be removed.The issue reported in the complaint that the enterprise device became impeded in the microcatheter was confirmed based on the condition of the returned device; however, with the information available and the evidence obtained from the returned devices, there is no indication that the issue reported in the complaint is a result of a defect inherently related to the device.The complaint detailed that a continuous flush had been maintained through the microcatheter; however, the amount of residue found in the microcatheter suggests that the flush may have not been adequate, without an adequate flush, issues such as resistance between the delivery wire and the microcatheter can arise.Other circumstances or issues may occur while using the device that could not be replicated during the analysis.Lake region medical performed a review of the device history records relative to the manufacturing, inspection, and packaging of the lot 8028668.The history record indicates this product was final inspection tested at lake region medical and was determined to be acceptable.As part of cerenovus quality process, all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released to approved specifications.It should be noted that product failure could be caused by multiple factors.The instructions for use (ifu) does contain the following recommendations: if resistance is met during manipulation, determine the cause of resistance before proceeding.Do not apply undue force if resistance is encountered at any point during stent manipulation.Withdraw the unit and advance a new one.Based on the manufacturing documentation review, there is no indication that the event is related to the device manufacturing process.As part of the post market surveillance program, information from this complaint is trended for statistical signals and corrective / preventive action may be triggered at a later time.Since there was no evidence to suggest the event was related to a manufacturing or design issue, no corrective actions will be taken at this time.This is one of 2 products involved with the reported complaint.The associated manufacturer report numbers are: 3008114965-2023-00913 and 3008114965-2023-00914.The manufacturer will submit a supplemental report if new facts arise which materially alter information submitted in a previous mdr report.Additional information will be submitted within 30 days of receipt.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Manufacturer¿s ref.No: (b)(4).The purpose of this mdr submission is to report that the product was received in the product analysis lab on 02-jan-2024.The returned product is pending evaluation.A supplemental 3500a report will be submitted once the product investigation has been completed.This is one of 2 products involved with the reported complaint.The associated manufacturer report numbers are: 3008114965-2023-00913 and 3008114965-2023-00914.The manufacturer will submit a supplemental report if new facts arise which materially alter information submitted in a previous mdr report.Additional information will be submitted within 30 days of receipt.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ENTERPRISE2 4MMX23MM
Type of Device
INTRACRANIAL NEUROVASCULAR STENT
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDOS INTERNATIONAL SARL
chemin-blanc 38
le locle neuchatel CH-24 00
SZ  CH-2400
Manufacturer (Section G)
CERENOVUS, INC.
325 paramount dr
raynham MA 02767
Manufacturer Contact
kate karberg
31 technology dr
irvine, CA 92618
303552-689
MDR Report Key18351709
MDR Text Key331074577
Report Number3008114965-2023-00913
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NJE
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeCH
PMA/PMN Number
H60001
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 01/08/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received12/18/2023
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue NumberENCR402312
Device Lot Number8028668
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received01/05/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured01/20/2023
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Treatment
PROWLER SELECT PLUS 150/5CM
Patient Age69 YR
Patient SexFemale
Patient Weight47 KG
Patient EthnicityNon Hispanic
Patient RaceAsian
-
-