• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ABBOTT IRELAND DIAGNOSTICS DIVISION SARS-COV-2-IGG REAGENT KIT; REAGENT, CORONAVIRUS SEROLOGICAL

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ABBOTT IRELAND DIAGNOSTICS DIVISION SARS-COV-2-IGG REAGENT KIT; REAGENT, CORONAVIRUS SEROLOGICAL Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 06R86-22
Device Problem False Negative Result (1225)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 12/01/2023
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
A journal article by francisco llorente, elisa pérez-ramírez, mayte pérez-olmeda, desirée dafouz-bustos, jovita fernández-pinero, mercedes martínez-cortés, and miguel ángel jiménez-clavero.¿the detection of sars-cov-2 antibodies in an exposed human population is biased by the immunoassay used: implications in serosurveillance¿, pathogens 2023, 12, 1360.Documented false negative architect sars-cov-2 igg results that were positive by elisa eurofins and roche clia.No impact to patient management was reported.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
An evaluation is in process.A follow up report will be submitted when the evaluation is complete.This report is being filed on an international product, list number 6r86-22 that has a similar product distributed in the us, list number 6r86-20.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The complaint investigation for false negative architect sars-cov-2 igg results included a search for similar complaints, review of the literature article, trending data, and labeling review.The review of complaints for the lot number was not performed as the lot was unknown.Trending review determined no trends for the issue for the product.Labeling was reviewed and found to adequately address the issue under review.The study referenced in the literature article (the detection of sars-cov-2 antibodies in an exposed human population is biased by the immunoassay used: implications in serosurveillance) used 668 serum samples from individuals in spain, collected during the first epidemic wave in april 2020.Out of these samples 93 were pcr positive before or on the day of sample collection (considered as ¿true positive¿ by the authors).A subset of these patients (115 samples that were positive by eurofins or idvet assays) were followed up at 2 and 7 months after initial sampling.The authors acknowledge a lack of a gold standard, so they used the eurofins elisa as reference for sensitivity and specificity calculations across all samples, however this is a total antibody kit detecting igm, igg and iga as opposed to the abbott kit which is igg specific.For follow up samples at 2 and 7 months, lower positivity was observed for the abbott assay, however once again, this was based on comparison to the ¿reference¿ assay which detects igg, igm and iga.In addition, the roche clia is also a total antibody assay, therefore direct comparison is not appropriate.The authors acknowledged that with sars-cov-2 infection, antibody levels can decline over time.Abbott updated the sars-cov-2 igg assay file to include an editable grayzone (0.49 to <1.40 s/co).This new grayzone would be applicable for those patients whose igg levels may be rising, i.E., during seroconversion, or may be declining, i.E., during seroreversion, with levels below the cutoff.In this study, the authors document the standard cut-off values recommended by the manufacturers were used.No specific result data were provided in this study, however, use of the grayzone may have improved detection of igg positivity further.Overall, assays of different formats (clia, lfa, elisa) and targets (nucleocapsid versus spike, total versus igg) were used in this study, making direct comparisons difficult, and the authors acknowledge that different aspects can affect sensitivity at different times post infections including isotype detected, antigen used and methodology of detection.Based on the investigation, the architect sars-cov-2 igg assay is performing as intended, no systemic issue or deficiency was identified.
 
Event Description
A journal article by francisco llorente, elisa pérez-ramírez, mayte pérez-olmeda, desirée dafouz-bustos, jovita fernández-pinero, mercedes martínez-cortés, and miguel ángel jiménez-clavero.¿the detection of sars-cov-2 antibodies in an exposed human population is biased by the immunoassay used: implications in serosurveillance¿, pathogens 2023, 12, 1360.Documented false negative architect sars-cov-2 igg results that were positive by elisa eurofins and roche clia.No impact to patient management was reported.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
SARS-COV-2-IGG REAGENT KIT
Type of Device
REAGENT, CORONAVIRUS SEROLOGICAL
Manufacturer (Section D)
ABBOTT IRELAND DIAGNOSTICS DIVISION
finisklin business park
sligo F91VY 44
EI  F91VY44
Manufacturer (Section G)
ABBOTT IRELAND DIAGNOSTICS DIVISION
finisklin business park
sligo F91VY 44
EI   F91VY44
Manufacturer Contact
nicole jenne
max-planck-ring 2
post market surveillance
wiesbaden 65205
GM   65205
6122582960
MDR Report Key18355334
MDR Text Key331215428
Report Number3008344661-2023-00199
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code QKO
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeSP
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Literature,Health Professional
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 01/10/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received12/19/2023
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue Number06R86-22
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received01/10/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
Treatment
ARC I2000SR INST, 03M74-02, SN# UNKNOWN; ARC I2000SR INST, 03M74-02, SN# UNKNOWN
-
-