• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ARJOHUNTLEIGH MAGOG INC.; LIFT, PATIENT, NON-AC-POWERED

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ARJOHUNTLEIGH MAGOG INC.; LIFT, PATIENT, NON-AC-POWERED Back to Search Results
Device Problem Insufficient Information (3190)
Patient Problems Fall (1848); No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 11/23/2023
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
The customer reported that a patient fell out from a sling because the staff member had used an xl size sling as the l size was not available at the time.The sling being used was a standard 4 point padded sling with head support.The customer was not willing to provide additional information regarding the event.Customer stated that they had already done their own internal investigation and found that it was staff error in sling size selection.She confirmed to me there was no fault with the arjo product.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Additional information will provided upon investigation conclusion.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Additional information will provided upon investigation conclusion.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The customer reported that during the transfer a patient fell out of the sling.During the interview, the customer indicated that the event occurred because the staff member used an incorrect size sling, and chose an xl size instead of the appropriate l size due to the unavailability of the latter at the time.No injury was reported.The customer stated that their internal investigation was conducted and found that it was a staff error in sling size selection.No fault was found with the sling.However, the customer declined to provide further details about the event circumstances.The arjo representative advised the customer how to select the proper size of the sling.Additionally, the customer informed that they plan to purchase additional slings to ensure they have a selection of slings available at all times.The instruction for use for passive clip sling contains information that: "the right type and size of slings should be used after proper assessment of each patient/resident's size, condition and the type| of lifting situation.If the patient/resident does not meet these criteria.An alternative equipment/system shall be used." due to the limited information provided to this complaint, we are unable to define the root cause of the reported patient fall.To sum up, the arjo sling was used during the patient transfer.The patient slip out of the device and in this regard, the lift and the sling which work as a system did not meet its performance specification.The complaint was decided to be reportable due to the information that the patient fell out from the device during transfer.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Type of Device
LIFT, PATIENT, NON-AC-POWERED
Manufacturer (Section D)
ARJOHUNTLEIGH MAGOG INC.
2001 tanguay street
magog, quebec J1X 5 Y5
CA  J1X 5Y5
Manufacturer (Section G)
ARJOHUNTLEIGH MAGOG INC.
2001 tanguay street
magog, quebec J1X 5 Y5
CA   J1X 5Y5
Manufacturer Contact
katarzyna bobrow
ks. wawrzyniaka 2
komorniki 62-05-2
PL   62-052
668046472
MDR Report Key18362216
MDR Text Key330940819
Report Number9681684-2023-00086
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code FSA
Combination Product (y/n)N
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type User Facility,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 02/01/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received12/20/2023
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Date Manufacturer Received11/23/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
Patient SexFemale
-
-