• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MICRO THERAPEUTICS, INC. DBA EV3 UNKNOWN SOLITAIRE; CATHETER, THROMBUS RETRIEVER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MICRO THERAPEUTICS, INC. DBA EV3 UNKNOWN SOLITAIRE; CATHETER, THROMBUS RETRIEVER Back to Search Results
Model Number UNK-NV-SOLITAIRE
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problems Intracranial Hemorrhage (1891); Failure of Implant (1924)
Event Date 10/19/2023
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Continuation of d10: product id unk-nv-solitaire (unknown); product type: ; implant date n/a; explant date n/a product id unk-nv-fg (unknown); product type: ; implant date n/a; explant date n/a product id unk-nv-fg (unknown); product type: ; implant date n/a; explant date n/a g2: citation: authors: biederko, r., honig, a., shabad, k., zlotnik, y., ben-arie, g., alguayn, f., shelef, i., <(>&<)> horev, a.Improved first-pass effect in acute stroke thrombectomy using solitaire-x compared to solitaire-fr.Frontiers in neurology 14:1215349 2023.Doi:10.3389/fneur.2023.1215349 earliest date of publication used for date of event no unique device identifier (serial/lot) numbers were provided; without this information it could not be determined whether these observations have been previously reported.Without return of the product no definitive conclusion can be made regarding the clinical observations.See manufacturer report # 2029214-2023-02438 and 2029214-2023-02439 for other reports from this article.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Biederko r, honig a, shabad k, et al.Improved first-pass effect in acute stroke thrombectomy using solitaire-x compared to solitaire-fr.Frontiers in neurology.2023;14:1215349.Doi:10.3389/fneur.2023.1215349 medtronic literature review found a report of patient complications in association with solitaire stent retriever and phenom microcatheter.The purpose of this article was to compare the procedural and clinical outcomes of solitaire fr to solitaire x.A total of 182 patients were included, with 91 procedures each using a solitaire fr or solitaire x.This included 111 males, and the mean age was 71.9 years old.It was noted that a phenom 21 microcatheter was used in some of the procedures, along with microcatheters from other manufacturers.The article does not state any technical issues during use of the  the following intra- or post-procedural outcomes were noted:  - the total 90-day-mortality was 32 patients (18 solitaire fr, 14 solitaire x). - in each solitaire group, there were seven patients who failed three attempts to recanalize with solitaire, and attempts were then made using other devices.Ultimately, rates of successful recanalization were similar between the two cohorts (90 solitaire fr, 88 solitaire x). - the solitaire-fr group had a double rate of post-procedural hemorrhagic transformation (27 solitaire fr, 14 solitaire x). - the mean number of repeated hospitalizations was.85 in the solitaire fr group, and.11 in the solitaire x group.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
UNKNOWN SOLITAIRE
Type of Device
CATHETER, THROMBUS RETRIEVER
Manufacturer (Section D)
MICRO THERAPEUTICS, INC. DBA EV3
9775 toledo way
irvine CA 92618
Manufacturer (Section G)
MICRO THERAPEUTICS, INC. DBA EV3
9775 toledo way
irvine CA 92618
Manufacturer Contact
glen belmer
9775 toledo way
irvine, CA 92618
6122713209
MDR Report Key18370279
MDR Text Key331049077
Report Number2029214-2023-02440
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NRY
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeIS
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Literature,Health Professional
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 12/20/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received12/20/2023
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberUNK-NV-SOLITAIRE
Device Catalogue NumberUNK-NV-SOLITAIRE
Device Lot NumberUNKNOWN
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received12/13/2023
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Treatment
SEE H10...
Patient Outcome(s) Hospitalization;
Patient Age71 YR
Patient SexMale
-
-