|
Model Number 505DM22 |
Device Problems
Inadequacy of Device Shape and/or Size (1583); Physical Resistance/Sticking (4012)
|
Patient Problem
Insufficient Information (4580)
|
Event Date 11/29/2023 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
|
Event Description
|
Medtronic received information that during the implant of this 22mm aortic mechanical valve, it was explanted and replaced with a different manufacturer's 19mm valve. the reason for the replacement was reported as the leaflets could not open due to large valve size, as the 22mm valve leaflets interfered with native tissue.It was stated that "after sizing, a 20mm aortic mechanical valve was selected but there was no stock so the physician used a 22mm size of the same model." it was reported that the physician stated that the event was caused by a sizing error, so there was no causal relationship with the mechanical valve.It was stated that the valve was fully sutured and tested prior to removal, the valve leaflet motion was tested with the blue actuator during the implant procedure and the valve rotated within the annulus in attempt to obtain appropriate leaflet motion.It was reported that the impingement tissue was not removed during the valve replacement and the native valve was not excised.No additional adverse patient effects were reported.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|