• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES EDWARDS INSPIRIS RESILIA AORTIC VALVE; HEART-VALVE, NON-ALLOGRAFT TISSUE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES EDWARDS INSPIRIS RESILIA AORTIC VALVE; HEART-VALVE, NON-ALLOGRAFT TISSUE Back to Search Results
Model Number 11500A
Device Problems Degraded (1153); Fluid/Blood Leak (1250); Gradient Increase (1270)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 08/12/2023
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
H10 additional narrative: the subject device is not available for evaluation as it remains implanted in the patient.The investigation is still in progress; therefore, a conclusion has yet to be established.A supplemental report will be submitted accordingly upon investigation completion.Edwards will continue to review and monitor all reported events.Trends are monitored on a monthly basis and if action is required, appropriate investigation will be performed.
 
Event Description
Edwards received notification that a 38-year-old patient with a valve model 11500a25 implanted in the aortic position underwent a valve-in-valve procedure after an implant duration of three (3) years and four (4) months due to valve degeneration leading to moderate to severe regurgitation and increased gradients.As reported, the patient already presented signs of degeneration with increased gradients (mean gradient 58mmhg) 4 months before re-intervention.As reported, the patient was asymptomatic.Last toe suggested moderate to severe aortic transvalvular regurgitation, normal leaflet movement, no stenosis.A 29mm transcatheter valve was successfully implanted within the surgical device.The patient was noted as to be discharged home on post-operative day 2.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Added information to section h6 (type of investigation), h6 (investigation findings) and h6 (investigations conclusions).H10: additional manufacturer narrative: the device history record (dhr) review was completed and this device passed all manufacturing and sterilization inspections prior to release for distribution.There were no issues identified that would have impacted this event.The device was not returned for evaluation as it remained implanted after the valve-in-valve (viv) procedure.Tissue degeneration-related structural deterioration, either calcific or non-calcific, are common chronic failure modes for this type of bioprosthetic heart valve.Operational mechanical stress and biological factors are generally believed to be the major contributors to the non-calcific bioprosthetic tissue degeneration.Structural valve deterioration (svd) can, and typically does, lead to chronic central leaks over a period of time.Svd is the most common reason for bioprosthesis explant and encompasses multiple failure modes, including calcification, noncalcific degeneration, dehiscence, cusp thickening or fibrosis, or a combination of these.Such failure modes may occur singularly or concomitantly.Degeneration-related structural deterioration is most commonly related to patient factors and is not usually an indication of a device malfunction related to a manufacturing deficiency.The instructions for use (ifu) have been reviewed and no inadequacies have been identified with regard to warnings, contraindications, and the directions/conditions for the successful use of the device.The reported type of event is included in the ifu.A definitive root cause cannot be conclusively determined; however, patient factors likely caused or contributed.
 
Event Description
Edwards received notification that a 38-year-old patient with a valve model 11500a25 implanted in the aortic position underwent a valve-in-valve procedure after an implant duration of three (3) years and four (4) months due to valve degeneration leading to moderate to severe regurgitation and increased gradients.As reported, the patient already presented signs of degeneration with increased gradients (mean gradient 58mmhg) 4 months before re-intervention.As reported, the patient was asymptomatic.Last toe suggested moderate to severe aortic transvalvular regurgitation, normal leaflet movement, no stenosis.Reportedly, this young patient was fit and a heavy weight lifter.Surgeons theorized that the heavy weight lifting and the excessive exercise could have had affected the changing pressures within the heart and the valve functionality.A 29mm transcatheter valve was successfully implanted within the surgical device.The patient was noted as to be discharged home on post-operative day 2.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
EDWARDS INSPIRIS RESILIA AORTIC VALVE
Type of Device
HEART-VALVE, NON-ALLOGRAFT TISSUE
Manufacturer (Section D)
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES
one edwards way
irvine CA 92614
Manufacturer (Section G)
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES
one edwards way
irvine CA 92614
Manufacturer Contact
saurav singh
1 edwards way
mle fl2 office m2013
irvine, CA 92614
9492506615
MDR Report Key18384295
MDR Text Key331288803
Report Number2015691-2023-18734
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LWR
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P150048
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 01/29/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received12/22/2023
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date06/18/2021
Device Model Number11500A
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Date Manufacturer Received01/03/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured06/19/2019
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Life Threatening; Hospitalization; Required Intervention;
Patient Age38 YR
Patient SexMale
Patient Weight108 KG
-
-