• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: RONIN SURGICAL CORP. RONIN SURGICAL CORP; HEADLAMP, OPERATING, BATTERY-OPERATED

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

RONIN SURGICAL CORP. RONIN SURGICAL CORP; HEADLAMP, OPERATING, BATTERY-OPERATED Back to Search Results
Model Number X6
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problem Burn(s) (1757)
Event Date 05/12/2023
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
As noted in the b.5 response, ronin responded promptly to conduct a thorough investigation.At that time, it also requested information from the surgeon with respect to her use of the device.Based upon its investigation and the surgeon's response to ronin's use questions, ronin can only conclude that its device was not the cause of the reported burn.
 
Event Description
This incident is the subject of medical device report mw5144689, which was submitted to fda on august 14, 2023 by dr.(b)(6).A copy of this mdr was provided to ronin by fda on september 12, 2023.On may 13, 2023, ronin surgical received an email communication from dr.(b)(6) informing ronin of a surgery performed several days prior during which the patient experienced a burn.A ronin x6 headlight was reportedly used during the procedure.It was further reported that the minimum distance the device was used at was greater than 12 inches from the patient.On or about may 15, 2023, during a phone call between ronin and (b)(6) hospital for children, a mutual decision was made by the parties that the hospital would return the headlight used in the surgery to ronin for evaluation.Ronin received the headlight used in the surgery, its holster, and its battery on or about may 25, 2023.Ronin conducted a manual inspection of the components and found no evidence of physical damage or mechanical abnormality.Ronin also conducted a functional test and found no evidence of abnormal behavior or performance.Thermocouple ("heat rise") testing was also conducted and confirmed that the alleged subject device was performing within specifications and was not defective; ronin therefore ruled out the headlight as a cause of the reported issue.At the hospital's request, ronin provided a report detailing its findings to the hospital on or about june 5, 2023.As of ronin's last communication with (b)(6) hospital for children's vp of quality on or about july 10, 2023, no additional information was provided by the hospital, and the results of the hospital's investigation were that they were not able to determine the cause of the burn.Disclaimer: this information is submitted pursuant to 21 cfr 803, in compliance with the medical device reporting requirement and should not be considered to be an admission that a ronin surgical product malfunctioned, is defective or has caused serious injury.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
RONIN SURGICAL CORP
Type of Device
HEADLAMP, OPERATING, BATTERY-OPERATED
Manufacturer (Section D)
RONIN SURGICAL CORP.
6420 avenida wilfredo
la jolla CA 92037
Manufacturer (Section G)
RONIN SURGICAL CORP.
6420 avenida wilfredo
la jolla CA 92037
Manufacturer Contact
clifton learn
6420 avenida wilfredo
la jolla, CA 92037
8589978085
MDR Report Key18390532
MDR Text Key331291122
Report Number3013682780-2023-00001
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code HPP
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 12/25/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received12/25/2023
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberX6
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer05/25/2023
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received05/13/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured10/07/2022
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Unknown
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
-
-