Manufacturer¿s ref.No: (b)(4).Information regarding patient identifier, date of birth, weight, and ethnicity were not provided.Section d.2b: procode is krd/hcg.Section e.1: the initial reporter email address is not available / reported.Section h.3: the device is available to be returned for evaluation and testing.However, it has not been received to date as indicated as ¿other¿ in this section as the reason for non-evaluation.If the device returns, a device investigation will be performed.A review of manufacturing documentation associated with this lot (31045746) presented no issues during the manufacturing or inspection processes related to the reported complaint.There were no nonconformances related to device manufacture or inspection.This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by cerenovus, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, cerenovus, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.Missing information from this report is identified as blank; this information was not provided in the reported event or available at the time of report submission.The manufacturer will submit a supplemental report if new facts arise which materially alter information submitted in a previous mdr report.Additional information will be submitted within 30 days of receipt.
|
The healthcare professional reported that during an endovascular embolization procedure, the physician was coiling a posterior communicating artery (pcom) aneurysm using cerepak coils.He deployed four (4) coils without incident.The fifth coil, a 1.5mm x 3cm cerepak freeform mini (mcr091530 / 31045746) was inserted into the aneurysm without difficulty.Manual break technique was attempted but was unsuccessful due to the fracturing of the pull wire.The coil was removed without issue and was observed intact in the field.The physician added three (3) more cerepak coils to the aneurysm without detachment failure.There was no negative patient outcome.On 14-dec-2023, additional information was received.Per the information, the patient is a (b)(6) female with a 5mm x 4mm unruptured pcom aneurysm.The information indicated that the manual break technique was used on all cerepak coils.The concomitant microcatheter was a 0.0165-inch inner diameter sl-10® microcatheter (stryker).There was approximately five (5) minutes added to the procedure time in trying to get the coil to detach and trying to remove it carefully without causing other coils to prolapse out of the aneurysm.
|