• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: JOHNSON & JOHNSON SURGICAL VISION, INC. VERITAS VISION SYSTEM; UNIT, PHACOFRAGMENTATION

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

JOHNSON & JOHNSON SURGICAL VISION, INC. VERITAS VISION SYSTEM; UNIT, PHACOFRAGMENTATION Back to Search Results
Model Number VRT680300
Device Problems Computer Software Problem (1112); Suction Problem (2170); Pumping Problem (3016); Noise, Audible (3273)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 12/12/2023
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
It was reported that during irrigation and aspiration (ia) after phacoemulsification, at the start of surgery, there was a loud noise around the pump causing a system error (134).The physician tried removing and replacing the pack, but the situation did not change.Since it was in the middle of ia, rough cortex was removed using a bi-manual ia with a shimko needle.After that, the continuation of the surgery was abandoned, and a large amount of ointment was used in the patients eye, and closed with an eye patch.The physician classed this as a second surgical intervention.Over two hours later a replacement machine was brought and the procedure was to be continued.However, due to the effect of the ointment applied in the patient's eye, the physician's visibility of the eye was severely reduced during the procedure and it was extremely difficult to finish the surgery as the patient's eyelashes were difficult to maneuver.It was also difficult to put a bandage on the patients eye properly.The physician is concerned this may lead to an infection in the patients eye.The doctor also stated feeling the aspiration being weak recently.There was a 180 minute significant delay.Procedure was successfully completed with backup eventually.This procedure was the fourth surgery of the day.No further details provided.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Section a2 and a4: unknown, as information was requested but not provided.Section d6a - implant date: not applicable, as there is no indication that the lens was implanted.Section d6b - explant date: not applicable, as there is no indication that the lens was implanted.Section e1 - email address: unknown, as information was requested but not provided section e1 - telephone number: (b)(6).Section h3 - other (81): the device was not returned for evaluation.Therefore, a failure analysis of the complaint device could not be completed.A review of the device history record, complaint trending, and risk documentation for this device will be performed.Upon completion of the review and possible product return and evaluation, if there is any further relevant information a supplemental medwatch will be filed.An attempt has been made to obtain missing information.However, to date, no response has been received.All pertinent information available to johnson and johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Additional information: additional information was received and it was learned that the patient has no injuries.Section h3 - device evaluated by manufacturer? yes.Device evaluation: the field service engineer evaluated the device and believes that the drain pump roller pin dropped down causing the issues.All pertinent information available to johnson and johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Section d9 - device available for evaluation? yes.Section h3 - device evaluated by manufacturer? yes.Device evaluation: service onsite by the field service engineer to evaluate the system.Service found one of the drain pump roller pins had fallen off.The pin got caught in the groove and drain pump stopped.The drain pump was replaced.After that, error 134 occurred.Probable cause: component failure [drain pump].There were no discrepancies or non-conformances experienced during manufacturing.The system and its components met all specifications prior to being released.Conclusion: as a result of the investigation, there is no indication of a product quality deficiency.All pertinent information available to johnson and johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
VERITAS VISION SYSTEM
Type of Device
UNIT, PHACOFRAGMENTATION
Manufacturer (Section D)
JOHNSON & JOHNSON SURGICAL VISION, INC.
31 technology drive
irvine CA 92618
Manufacturer Contact
somyata nagpal
31 technology drive
irvine, CA 92618
7142478552
MDR Report Key18414690
MDR Text Key331581773
Report Number3012236936-2023-03266
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code HQC
UDI-Device Identifier05050474700864
UDI-Public(01)05050474700864
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeJA
PMA/PMN Number
K203060
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 03/15/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received12/28/2023
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberVRT680300
Device Catalogue NumberVRT680300
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Date Manufacturer Received02/22/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured04/18/2023
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient EthnicityNon Hispanic
Patient RaceAsian
-
-